Critical Factors Affecting Street Littering Behavior of Youth

Authors

  • Zainab Maharoof Department of Public Administration, University of Sri Jayewardenepura https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-9218
  • M. S. Dimuthu Kumari Department of Public Administration, University of Sri Jayewardenepura
  • Sachi Dilami Ilangasekara Department of Social Statistics, University of Sri Jayewardenepura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v3i2.84

Keywords:

Critical factors, Street littering, Youth

Abstract

Street littering has known to be a global phenomenon over the years. The intensity of littering varies across societies and age groups. This study on street littering is centered around youth. The objectives cover two aspects: exploring factors affecting street littering behavior in Sri Lanka and suggesting policy implications. The study adopted quantitative methods based on deductive reasoning approach. Data was collected as survey research using the simple random sampling technique. 315 youth were selected out of the total youth population in Colombo, Sri Lanka in 2022. Analysis of data was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Analytical tools such as Pearson correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent sample t-test, and chi-square test were used. The study found to have a strong association between street littering behavior and two critical factors; visibility of litter and group behavior which corresponded with social psychological theories namely theory of deindividuation and theory of social comparison. A significant association with age and education was also indicated against street littering behavior while a weak relationship was noticed between environmental factors. The study suggests policymakers to focus on urgent and long-term sustainable solutions. Short term recommendations include positive and negative reinforcement strategies. The long-term sustainable solutions are proposed to make self-transformations within youth via attitudinal changes. Among the social science researchers in Sri Lanka, ‘Street littering behavior’ is considered an under-researched area. Hence this study provides both academic and empirical implications. Future research can be extended both locally and globally by comparing different demographic variables and changing the research study contexts within the same theme.

References

Algina, J., T.C. Oshima, & Lin, W., (1994). Type 1 Error Rates for Welch’s Test and James’s Second-Order Test Under Nonnormality and Inequality of Variance When There are Two Groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19(3), 275–291.

Al-Khatib, I., Arafat, H., Daoud, R. & Shwahneh, H., (2009). Enhanced solid waste management by understanding the effects of gender, income, marital status, and religious convictions on attitudes and practices related to street littering in Nablus – Palestinian territory. Waste Management, 29(1), 449–455.

Al-Mosa, & Abdullah S., Y., (2017). Extending Understanding of Middle Eastern Littering Behaviour Beyond the Individual: A Formative Research Study (Ph.D.). Griffith Business School.

Asmui, M., Zaki, S. M., Wahid, S. N. S., Mokhtar, N. M., & Harith, S. S. (2017). Association between litterers’ profile and littering behavior: A chi-square approach. AIP Conference Proceedings 1842, 030003 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982841

Campbell, F., (2007). People who Litter. Wigan: Encams

Chin, R. & Lee, B., (2008). Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Data Collection Survey on Solid Waste Management in Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. (2016).

de Kort, Y. A. W., McCalley, L. T., & Midden, C. J. H. (2008). Persuasive Trash Cans. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 870–891.

Freije, A. M., Naser, H. A., & Abdulla, K. H. (2019). Attitudes and opinions towards public littering in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 26(1), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.1628688

Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The Impact of Levene’s Test of Equality of Variances on Statistical Theory and Practice. Statistical Science, 24(3), 343–360.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

Igwenagu, C., (2016). Fundamentals of research methodology and data collection. Chisinau: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Immler, N. & Sakkers, H., (2021). The UN-Sustainable Development Goals going local: learning from localising human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 1–23.

Khawaja, F. & Shah, A., (2013). Determinants of Littering: An Experimental Analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 52(2), 157–168.

Kim, H., (2014). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing means of more than two groups. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 39(1), 74–77.

Litter Strategy for England. (2017). Annual Report (2019 to 2022). London: Litter Strategy for England.

Lyndhurst, B., (2013). Rapid Evidence Review of Littering Behaviour and Anti-Litter Policies. Stirling: Zero Waste Scotland.

Muñoz-Cadena, C. E., Lina-Manjarrez, P., Estrada-Izquierdo, I., & Ramón-Gallegos, E. (2012). An Approach to Litter Generation and Littering Practices in a Mexico City Neighborhood. Sustainability, 4(8), 1733–1754.

National Visible Litter Survey and Litter Cost Research Study. (2009).

Nkwocha, E. & Okeoma, I., (2009). Street Littering in Nigerian Towns: towards a Framework for Sustainable Urban Cleanliness. African Research Review, 3(5), 147–164.

Ojedokun, O. (2015). The littering attitude scale (LAS). Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 26(4), 552–565.

Pallant, J., (2005). SPSS Survival Manual (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Robinson, S., (1975). Social and Environmental Influences on Littering Behavior (Ph.D.). Georgia Institute of Technology.

Schultz, P. W., Bator, R. J., Large, L. B., Bruni, C. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in Context. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 35–59.

Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R., (2016). Research Methods for Business (7th ed.). United kingdom: Wiley.

Taherdoost, H., (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-23

How to Cite

Maharoof, Z., Kumari, M. S. D., & Ilangasekara, S. D. (2022). Critical Factors Affecting Street Littering Behavior of Youth. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 3(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v3i2.84

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): (October 2022)

Section

Articles

License

Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.

1. Licence

Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,

2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,

3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,

4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.

7. Miscellaneous

Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.