Indigenous Rights in Climate Governance: A Comparative Qualitative Study of Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v7i2.832Keywords:
Carbon Colonialism, Climate Governance, Indigenous PeoplesAbstract
This article examines how human rights paradigms are integrated into climate policymaking through institutional and regulatory governance, focusing on grassroots realities in the Global South. Addressing literature dominated by bibliometric meta-analyses and top-down normative studies, it adopts a qualitative comparative design covering Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. Data are triangulated from key informant interviews, community observations, and legal discourse analysis. The findings reveal a persistent paradox: although international legal frameworks increasingly recognise procedural rights, market-based mitigation initiatives such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) may reproduce forms of carbon colonialism. This governance architecture can bypass Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), as illustrated by the Kichwa experience in Peru’s Cordillera Azul National Park. Indigenous agency has nevertheless generated legal and institutional resistance, including the December 2024 Bellavista Mixed Court ruling, the Sarayaku people’s Kawsak Sacha declaration, Ecuador’s Yasuní referendum, and Colombia’s asymmetrical decentralisation under Decree 632 of 2018. The article also considers Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-32/25 and highlights solastalgia as an often-overlooked psychological consequence of climate change. It concludes that formal rights recognition remains limited without power redistribution, direct territorial funding, and effective enforcement. The study is particularly relevant to SDGs 10, 13, 15, and 16, with implications for SDG 3.
References
Alam, S., & Razzaque, J. (2026). Contested forests: how transnational networks mitigate and reproduce conflict. World Development, 200, 107301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107301
Albrecht, G. (2005). 'Solastalgia'. A new concept in health and identity. PAN: philosophy activism nature, (3), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.26180/4311905
Antoniazzi, C. T. (2023). Strengthening the complaint mechanisms of multilateral climate funds and carbon markets: A critical step towards a human rights-based green transition. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 32(2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12489
Arévalo-Ramírez, W., & Rousset-Siri, A. (2025). Measuring the Impact of Advisory Opinions in the Inter-American Human Rights System: Categorizing the Effects of Advisory Opinions in States and the Organs Involved in Their Implementation. International Community Law Review, 27(1-2), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10133
Atapattu, S. (2024). Linking international human rights law and climate change. In M.-C. Cordonier Segger & C. Voigt (Eds.), Routledge handbook of climate law and governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276678-9
Auz, J. (2024). The political ecology of climate remedies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Comparing compliance between national and Inter-American litigation. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 16(1), 182–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad057
Ayalon, L., Keating, N., Pillemer, K., & Rabheru, K. (2021). Climate change and mental health of older persons: A human rights imperative. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(10), 1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2021.06.015
Barletti, J. P. S., Begert, B., & Loza, M. A. G. (2021). Is the formalization of collective tenure rights supporting sustainable indigenous livelihoods? International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1126
Behnassi, M. (2019). Mainstreaming a rights-based approach in the global climate regime. In M. Behnassi, H. Gupta, & O. Pollmann (Eds.), Human and environmental security in the era of global risks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92828-9_1
Belfer, E., Ford, J. D., Maillet, M., Araos, M., & Flynn, M. (2019). Pursuing an indigenous platform: Exploring opportunities and constraints for indigenous participation in the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Politics, 19(1), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00489
Bellinkx, V., Casalin, D., Erdem Türkelli, G., Scholtz, W., & Vandenhole, W. (2022). Addressing climate change through international human rights law: From (extra)territoriality to common concern of humankind. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204710252100011X
Bodansky, D. (2015). Climate change: Transnational legal order or disorder? In T. C. Halliday & G. Shaffer (Eds.), Transnational legal orders (pp. 287–308). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707092.011
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, D. A. (2018). Using the Paris Agreement’s ambition ratcheting mechanisms to expose insufficient protection of human rights. In S. Duyck, S. Jodoin, & A. Johl (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human rights and climate governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315312576-15
Brunelli, S., & Falivena, C. (2025). Public Sector Accountability Challenges in Emerging Climate Governance: Seeking Consequentiality Through a Theoretical Common Ground. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 8321-8333. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70033
Cameron, E., & Limon, M. (2012). Restoring the climate by realizing rights: The role of the international human rights system. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 21(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12004
Caney, S. (2008). Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environmental Politics, 17(4), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802193401
Caney, S. (2009). Climate change, human rights and moral thresholds. In S. Humphreys (Ed.), Human rights and climate change (pp. 69–90). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195399622.003.0018
Chen, C. W. (2025). Human rights-based climate litigation, national courts, and Indigenous peoples: An exploratory study. Journal of Human Rights, 24(5), 512-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2025.2567271
Choy, L. Y. (2026). Evaluating Multilateral Development Banks’ Environmental and Social Policies for Green Hydrogen Projects: A Content Analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 10704965261418543. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965261418543
Contipelli, E. (2019). Polycentric approach to global constitutionalism and climate change. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, 10(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda2532
Cubas-Baez, A., Sunderlin, W., Larson, A. M., & Frechette, A. (2025). From promises to practice: Persistent challenges in safeguarding local rights in forest carbon market initiatives. CABI Reviews, 20(1), 0025. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2025.0025
de Ridder, K., Schultz, F. C., & Pies, I. (2023). Procedural climate justice: Conceptualizing a polycentric solution to a global problem. Ecological Economics, 214, Article 107998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107998
Dehm, J. (2021). Reconsidering REDD+: Authority, power and law in the green economy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108529341
Durmaz, Z., & Schroeder, H. (2025). Indigenous contestations of carbon markets, carbon colonialism, and power dynamics in international climate negotiations. Climate, 13(8), Article 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13080158
Duyck, S. (2019). Delivering on the Paris promises? Review of the Paris Agreement’s implementing guidelines from a human rights perspective. Climate Law, 9(3), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00903004
Flores, E. C., Flores, A. F., Abarca-Diaz, B., Camizan-Castro, R., Mendoza-Lozada, E., Ortiz-Contreras, F., & Kakuma, R. (2025). Fostering leadership and gender equality in climate action among underserved, rural and Indigenous women: A qualitative exploration of opportunities and limitations in Peru. The Lancet Regional Health–Americas, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2025.101109
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813123
Gunaydin, E., & Park, S. (2024). Accountability enablers? The role of transnational activism in the use of multilateral development bank grievance mechanisms. Policy and Society, 43(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad014
Gustafsson, M.-T., & Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2022). Indigenous peoples and multiscalar environmental governance: The opening and closure of participatory spaces. Global Environmental Politics, 22(2), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00642
Hayes, K., Blashki, G., Wiseman, J., Burke, S., & Reifels, L. (2018). Climate change and mental health: Risks, impacts and priority actions. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 12, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6
Jamali, H. (2025). Extraterritorial jurisdiction and climate harm. Comparative Law Review. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2025.003
Jodoin, S. (2019). Transnational legal process and discourse in environmental governance: The case of REDD+ in Tanzania. Law & Social Inquiry, 44(4), 1019–1050. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.7
Jodoin, S., Savaresi, A., & Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2021). Rights-based approaches to climate decision-making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.004
Karageorgou, V. (2021). The interrelation between public participation and access to justice in the EIA context in the face of the increasing use of digital technologies: Comment on the CJEU judgment in the A.Flausch et al case (C-280/18). Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 18(1–2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-18010004
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Groff, M., Tamás, P. A., Dahl, A. L., Harder, M., & Hassall, G. (2018). Entry into force and then? The Paris Agreement and state accountability. Climate Policy, 18(5), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904
Kelman, I., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Rose-Clarke, K., Prost, A., Ronneberg, E., Wheeler, N., & Watts, N. (2021). A review of mental health and wellbeing under climate change in small island developing states (SIDS). Environmental Research Letters, 16(3), Article 033007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57d
Knox, J. H. (2014). Climate ethics and human rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5(Special Issue), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711900.00009
Lantes, J. P. (2025). Climate emergency and human rights: Perspectives of the consultative process of the Inter-American Court. In V. E. de Aquino, C. Loureiro, & V. Villani Abrantes (Eds.), Climate litigation in a changing world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05530-9_15
Larrea, G. (2024). Climate funds and sustainable development: Who pays in the end? Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50218-7
Lefstad, L., & Paavola, J. (2024). The evolution of climate justice claims in global climate change negotiations under the UNFCCC. Critical Policy Studies, 18(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2235405
Levy, B. S., & Patz, J. A. (2015). Climate change, human rights, and social justice. Annals of Global Health, 81(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.008
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lozano Flores, L., Delgado Pugley, D., Casas Luna, S., Van den Broeck, P., & Parra, C. (2024). Challenging state authority and hierarchical power: A case study of the engagement of Peru's Amazonian Indigenous Peoples' organizations in the governance of REDD+. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2067
Maldonado, J. K., Shearer, C., Bronen, R., Peterson, K., & Lazrus, H. (2013). The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the US: Displacement, relocation, and human rights. Climatic Change, 120(3), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0746-z
Monterroso, I., & Sils, E. (2022). Interaction of conditional incentives for ecosystem conservation with tenure security. In M. B. Holland, Y. J. Masuda, & B. E. Robinson (Eds.), Land tenure security and sustainable development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81881-4_10
Murphy, T., & Müller, A. (2018). The United Nations special procedures: Peopling human rights, peopling global health. In B. M. Meier & L. O. Gostin (Eds.), Human rights in global health: Rights-based governance for a globalizing world (pp. 455–478). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190672676.003.0023
Naranjo, V. M., Narváez, M. J., & Franco, A. V. (2022). The dispute over the meaning of nature as a subject of rights in Ecuador. Law of Justice Journal, 36(3), 224–252. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v36i3.14202
Newell, P. (2011). Civil society and accountability in the global governance of climate change. In J. A. Scholte (Ed.), Building global democracy?: Civil society and accountable global governance (pp. 225–244). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921476.012
Nyambura, R. (2016). In between rhetoric and the UNFCCC’s detachment from the lived realities of the people on the frontlines. Development, 59(1–2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0095-8
Olawuyi, D. S. (2016). The human rights-based approach to carbon finance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226285
Opoku, S. K., Filho, W. L., Hubert, F., & Adejumo, O. (2021). Climate change and health preparedness in Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), Article 4672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094672
Orellana, M. (2016). Governance and the Sustainable Development Goals: The increasing relevance of access rights in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 25(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12153
Peck, M. R., Desselas, M., Bonilla‐Bedoya, S., Redín, G., & Durango‐Cordero, J. (2024). The conflict between Rights of Nature and mining in Ecuador: Implications of the Los Cedros Cloud Forest case for biodiversity conservation. People and Nature, 6(3), 1096-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10615
Pedersen, O. W. (2011). The Janus-head of human rights and climate change: Adaptation and mitigation. Nordic Journal of International Law, 80(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181011X598427
Prityi, M. (2024). Human rights and environmental protection: Environmental procedural rights in the EU, India and China. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003530428
Purdon, M. (2024). The political economy of climate finance effectiveness in developing countries. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197756836.001.0001
Roth, G. S., Bermudez Del Villar, A., Amharech, A., Forrest, L., & Carvalho, M. (2025). Implementing Indigenous rights through climate–health governance: Advancing the Indigenous Determinants of Health framework within the UNFCCC. Frontiers in Climate, 7, 1697881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1697881
Savaresi, A., & Auz, J. (2019). Climate change litigation and human rights: Pushing the boundaries. Climate Law, 9(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00903006
Savaresi, A., & Hartmann, J. (2020). Using human rights law to address the impacts of climate change: Early reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry. In J. Lin & D. A. Kysar (Eds.), Climate change litigation in the Asia Pacific (pp. 73–93). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108777810.005
Schade, J., & Obergassel, W. (2014). Human rights and the Clean Development Mechanism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(4), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.961407
Schapper, A. (2018). Local rights claims in international negotiations: Transnational human rights networks at the climate conferences. In S. Duyck, S. Jodoin, & A. Johl (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human rights and climate governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315312576-4
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
SIAS South Asia. (2021). A guide to qualitative field research on climate governance and resource politics. SIAS Publications.
ten Hoope-Bender, P., Martin Hilber, A., Nove, A., Bandali, S., Nam, S., Armstrong, C., Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed, Chatuluka, M. G., Magoma, M., & Hulton, L. (2016). Using advocacy and data to strengthen political accountability in maternal and newborn health in Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 135(3), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.10.003
Tigre, M. A., & Viveros-Uehara, T. (2025). The Inter-American Human Rights System and climate litigation. In C. A. Gomes, H. Oliveira, A. Rocha, & M. Fermeglia (Eds.), Climate change before international courts. Routledge.
Venn, A. (2023). Rendering international human rights law fit for purpose on climate change. Human Rights Law Review, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac034
Vernaza Arroyo, G. D., & Cruel Preciado, M. (2024). Constituent elements of the rights of nature in Ecuador. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 30(1), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v30i1.41656
Vilavicencio Calzadilla, P. (2018). Human rights and the new sustainable mechanism of the Paris Agreement: A new opportunity to promote climate justice. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a3189
Villhauer, B., & Sylvester, O. (2021). Decolonizing REDD+ for climate change mitigation: Case study of Costa Rica’s cultural mediators program. In J. M. Luetz & D. Ayal (Eds.), Handbook of climate change management (pp. 4147–4172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_217
Voigt, C. (2022). The climate change dimension of human rights: Due diligence and states’ positive obligations. Human Rights and the Planet. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.00.05
Wallbott, L., & Schapper, A. (2017). Negotiating by own standards? The use and validity of human rights norms in UN climate negotiations. International Environmental Agreements, 17(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9315-4
Wenzel, A. (2025). Litigation for climate justice: The case of procedural rights under the Aarhus Convention. Ius Gentium. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05530-9_3
Zelli, F., & Van Asselt, H. (2015). Fragmentation. In K. Bäckstrand & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 121–131). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470600.00020
Zhang, L., & Bai, E. (2023). The regime complexes for global climate governance. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 9077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119077
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizal Khadafi, Erwin Asmadi, Agus Irfan, Annisa Rengganis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
