Actor Asymmetries and Sustainable Development Outcomes in Sister City Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v7i2.806Keywords:
Asymmetric Relations, Paradiplomacy, Sister City RelationshipsAbstract
Sister City Relationships (SCRs) have become an important instrument of paradiplomacy through which local governments engage in international cooperation to support local development. Yet, despite operating within similar decentralisation frameworks, SCRs produce divergent outcomes, ranging from failure and stagnation to sustained cooperation. Existing studies largely explain these variations through policy change, institutional capacity, and human resources, while the role of asymmetric relations remains underexplored. This study examines Medan’s partnerships with Milwaukee (United States), Gwangju (South Korea), Penang (Malaysia), and Ichikawa (Japan) through a qualitative case study informed by Asymmetry Theory. The findings identify three interrelated dimensions shaping cooperation outcomes: coordination, relational, and collaboration. In the coordination dimension, asymmetries between state and sub-state actors are associated with cooperation failure where hierarchical relations constrain local action. In the relational dimension, asymmetries between sub-state and non-state actors contribute to programme stagnation when local governments fail to accommodate non-state actors’ interests and expectations. By contrast, asymmetries between partner cities within the collaboration dimension can facilitate knowledge transfer, resource complementarity, and capacity building, thereby supporting successful cooperation. The study demonstrates that asymmetric relations are an inherent feature of SCRs and an important explanatory factor in variations in cooperation outcomes. The findings also underscore the relevance of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11 and 17 by highlighting effective local governance and multi-stakeholder partnerships.
References
Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2022). Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance. Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09431-3
Acharya, K. K., & Scott, J. (2022). A study of the capabilities and limitations of local governments in providing community services in Nepal. Public Administration and Policy, 25(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-01-2022-0006
Acuto, M., & Leffel, B. (2021). Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks. Urban Studies, 58(9), 1758–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020929261
Akther, S., & Evans, J. (2024). Emerging attributes of adaptive governance in the global south. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12(March), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1372157
Bandauko, E., & Bobo, T. (2018). City to city partnerships and implications for local government operations: A case study of Harare (Zimbabwe) and Munich (Germany) twinning arrangement. In Handbook of Research on Urban Governance and Management in the Developing World (pp. 37–48). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4165-3.ch003
Baycan-Levent, T., Akgün, A. A. G., & Kundak, S. (2010). Success conditions for urban networks: Eurocities and sister cities. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1187–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003791259
Behnke, N., & Mueller, S. (2017). The purpose of intergovernmental councils: A framework for analysis and comparison. Regional and Federal Studies, 27(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1367668
Berniak-Woźny, J., Sliż, P., & Siciński, J. (2025). Empowering Smart Cities Through Start-Ups: A Sustainability Framework for Incubator-City Collaboration. Systems, 13(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040219
Bhanye, J. (2025). A review study on community-based flood adaptation in informal settlements in the Global South. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01449-6
Buhmann, A. (2022). Unpacking Joint Attributions of Cities and Nation States as Actors in Global Affairs. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10092
Clarke, N. (2009). In what sense “spaces of neoliberalism”? The new localism, the new politics of scale, and town twinning. Political Geography, 28(8), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.001
Cohen, G. (2020). The sister cities program and tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45(March), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.08.012
Cohen, G. (2021). How the sister cities program promotes tourism. Israel Affairs, 27(2), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2021.1891506
Cornago, N. (2010). On the normalization of sub-state diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1–2), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-05010102
Cornago, N. (2016). Paradiplomatics Cultures: Old and New. In J. Dittmer & F. McConnell (Eds.), Diplomatic Cultures and International Politics: Translations, spaces and alternatives (1st ed., pp. 175–194). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
de Villiers, J. C. (2009). Success factors and the city-to-city partnership management process - from strategy to alliance capability. Habitat International, 33(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.018
Dudung, A. (2016). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dengan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.501
Dzazira, R. H., & Pratama, D. P. (2023). Empowering Urban Diplomacy: Surabaya’s Sister City Collaboration with Kitakyushu, Japan for Sustainable Development. Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks, 2(1), Layouting-Layouting. https://doi.org/10.18196/jpcn.v2i1.17
Fitriana, N., Hakiki, B., & Rubiyanto, C. (2022). The Impact of Sister City Surabaya-Kitakyushu Cooperation on Environmental Development in Surabaya. Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks, 1(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.18196/jpcn.v1i1.15
Freire, M. R. (2017). EU relations with the BRICS: Strategic partnership or structural disjunction? International Organisations Research Journal, 12(3), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2017-03-182
Grandi, L. K. (2020). City diplomacy. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007.978-3-030-60717-3
He, B., Tang, M., & Wei, A. (2025). The impact of city diplomacy on foreign direct investment: Evidence from international sister city diplomacy agreements. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99(December 2024), 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104076
Hidayat, A. R., Hospes, O., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2025). Why Democratization and Decentralisation in Indonesia Have Mixed Results on the Ground: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration and Development, 45(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2095
Hu, T., Natarajan, S., & Delios, A. (2021). Sister cities, cross-national FDI, and the subnational FDI location decision. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(7), 1279–1301. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00409-2
IMD. (2020). Smart City Observatory. Imd.Org. https://www.imd.org/smart-city-observatory/home/rankings/
Jatmika, S. (2001). Otonomi Daerah: Perspektif Hubungan Internasional. Bigraf.
Johnston, K. (2015). Public governance: the government of non-state actors in ‘partnerships.’ Public Money and Management, 35(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.986860
Kamiński, T., Frenkel, M., & Matiaszczyk, N. (2026). MAPPING THE TERRAIN: A Comprehensive Review of Paradiplomacy Literature. In J. A. Schiavon, J. Ciesielska-Klikowska, T. Kamiński, & R. V. Flores (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Paradiplomacy (1st ed., pp. 7–20). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003608684-3
Khoerunnisa, R., & Maulana, Z. (2023). Para diplomacy through Sister City Cooperation: Efforts to Increase the Potential of the Agricultural Sector in Karawang District. E3S Web of Conferences, 444. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344402045
Kim, C. H. (2005). Reciprocity in asymmetry: When does reciprocity work? International Interactions, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620590919371
Kipkemoi, I., Sitati, G. K., & Gakai, P. K. (2025). Exploring the impact of sister city partnerships on emerging African cities. Discover Cities, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00106-x
Kong, J., Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2025). Building smarter cities together: Government-to-government partnerships in the development of smart cities. Cities, 156(October 2024), 105532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105532
Kuznetsov, A. S. (2014). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. In Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817088
Larasati, G. Y., Fernando, H., Jubba, H., Abdullah, I., Darus, M. R., & Iribaram, S. (2023). Past preferences informing future leaders for Indonesian 2024 general elections. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2229110
Lecours, A. (2008). Political issues of paradiplomacy: lessons from the developed world. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations’ Clingendael’.
Li, J., Liu, B., & Qian, G. (2019). The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.004.
Li, Y., Chen, S., & Peng, Y. (2023). In the Shadow of Administrative Decentralisation: The Impact of Devolution on Subnational Service Provision. American Review of Public Administration, 53(7–8), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231185849
Liu, T., & Song, Y. (2020). Chinese paradiplomacy: A theoretical review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/2158244019899048
Long, T. (2017). Small states, great power? Gaining influence through intrinsic, derivative, and collective power. International Studies Review, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw040
Mahardika, M. T., & Darmawan, A. (2020). Implikasi Kebijakan One China Policy dalam Kegagalan Kerjasama Sister City antara Bogor dan Tainan di Taiwan. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i2.7909
Marchetti, R. (2021). City Diplomacy: From City-States to Global City. University of Michigan Press.
Mauad, A., & Betsill, M. (2019). A changing role in global climate governance: São Paulo mixing its climate and international policies. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900209
Milani, C. R. S., & Ribeiro, M. C. M. (2011). International relations and the paradiplomacy of Brazilian cities: Crafting the concept of local international management. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 8(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922011000100003
Miranda-Lescano, R., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2023). Human development and decentralisation: The importance of public health expenditure. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 94(1), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12373
Mueller, S. (2008). The Nexus of U.S. Public Diplomacy and Citizen Diplomacy. In Public Diplomacy (p. 8). Routledge.
Mukti, T. A. (2013). Paradiplomacy Kerjasama Luar Negeri oleh Pemda di Indonesia. The Phinisi Press.
Nganje, F. (2014). The developmental paradiplomacy of South African provinces: Context, scope and the challenge of coordination. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 9(2), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341273
Nuralam, I. P. (2018). Peran Strategis Penerapan Konsep Sister City Dalam Menciptakan Surabaya Green-City. Journal of Applied Business Administration, 2(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaba.v2i1.807
Prasittisopin, L., Kitkuakul, P., Chotchakornpant, K., & Rugkhapan, N. T. (2024). Implementing the Sister City Policy: Perspectives from Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 23(2), 2024. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202423413
Raile, A. N. W., Raile, E. D., & Post, L. A. (2021). Analysis and action: The political will and public will approach. Action Research, 19(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318772662
Ruel, T., Vilela, N. B., Silva, N. J., & Oplotnik, Ž. J. (2023). Intergovernmental Coordination in Portugal. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 32(5), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.5.31-42
Ryan, H. E., & Mazzilli, C. (2021). Debating the value of twinning in the United Kingdom: the need for a broader perspective. British Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00163-x
Septiarika, R. (2020). Advokasi Kebijakan dalam Kerjasama Smart City Bandung dan Seoul lewat Kemitraan Sister City tahun 2016-2019. Khazanah Sosial, 2(3), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v2i3.9364
Sharp, P. (2001). Making Sense of Citizen Diplomats: The People of Duluth, Minnesota, as International Actors. International Studies Perspective, 2(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00045
Sidik, H. (2019). Paradiplomasi Lampung : Harapan dan Realitas. Sosiologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Budaya, 21(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.23960/sosiologi.v21i2.352
Sinambela, S. I. (2019). Kerjasama Internasional Oleh Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus: Medan-Penang). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.3.2.2019.185-200
Sinambela, S. I., Al-fadhat, F., Mukti, T. A., & Warsito, T. (2024). The Art of Asymmetry in Sister City Relationships Factors Analysis. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2065
Sinambela, S. I., Al-Fadhat, F., Mukti, T. A., & Warsito, T. (2025). Leveraging Asymmetric Relations in Sister City Relationships. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), XIV(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.14.1.15-31.2025
Smith, H. J. M. (2019). City networks and paradiplomacy as global public policy. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration (First edit, pp. 129–147). Oxford University Press.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network Governance and Post-Liberal Democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10841806.2005.11029489
Surmacz, B. (2018). City Diplomacy. Barometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy, 16(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.382
Ulung, A. K., Saputro, P. B., & Setiawan, Y. (2025). International Regimes in Sister City Partnerships: An Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Adoption in Bandung-Kawasaki Collaboration. MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 9(2), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v9i2.11565
Womack, B. (2004). Asymmetry theory and China’s concept of multipolarity. Journal of Contemporary China, 13(39), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067056042000211942
Wright, D. S. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
Yao, Y., & Zhang, M. (2015). Subnational leaders and economic growth: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(4), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9116-1
Yasmin, T., Farrelly, M. A., Rogers, B. C., Krause, S., & Lynch, I. (2023). A tale of two cities: evidence from the Global South on established versus emerging cities’ approaches to adaptive and sustainable water governance. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13599-280138
Yermekbayev, A., Khairullayeva, V., Iztayeva, V., Zhuztayeva, B., & Doszhanova, A. (2020). Relations between Turkey and Russia in the context of energy partnership. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(4), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8448
Yian, W., & Fang, H. (2021). On the Impact of “sister City Relationship” on China’s outward foreign direct investment: A study based on evidences of BRI participating countries. 2021 International Conference on Public Management and Intelligent Society, PMIS 2021, 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/PMIS52742.2021.00030
Zhai, F. (2018). China’s belt and road initiative: A preliminary quantitative assessment. Journal of Asian Economics, 55(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006
Zhang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Connect Globally, Thrive Locally: The Spillover Effect of Sister-City Inward FDI on Regional Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 4634–4646. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3243626
Zhang, Y., Zhao, B., & Chen, W. (2025). Role of international sister-city partnerships in facilitating sustainable urbanisation: practices between Manchester and Wuhan. Global Sustainability, 8. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10029
Zulian, I., & Sinambela, S. I. (2019). Analisis Kontribusi dan Hambatan Kerjasama Sister City antara Pemerintah Kota Medan dan Rostov on Don ( Rusia ). Prosiding Konvensi Nasional X Asosiasi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Indonesia (AIHII), 10, 22–25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stivani Ismawira Sinambela, Apriwan Apriwan, Ahmad Sahide
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
