The Role of Institutional Quality in Shaping Digital Governance in Decentralised Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v7i1.793Keywords:
Digital Governance, Digital Transformation, Institutional QualityAbstract
This study examines how institutional quality shapes digital governance across local governments in Indonesia, addressing the persistent institutional–technical misalignment that continues to hinder digital transformation despite substantial public investment. The study is motivated by efforts to localise the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 16, Targets 16.6 and 16.7, on effective, accountable, and transparent institutions and responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making, as well as SDG 9, Target 9.c, on universal internet access. Achieving these goals remains difficult across Indonesia’s diverse regional contexts because of entrenched institutional barriers. Using a qualitative multiple-case study design, this research analyses five subnational cases, Jakarta, West Java, East Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua, selected to capture varying levels of digital maturity and contrasting geographical conditions within Indonesia’s decentralised governance system. The findings indicate that four institutional dimensions, regulatory frameworks, organisational capacity, leadership commitment, and inter-agency coordination, decisively shape digital governance outcomes and mediate regional disparities. The study concludes that digital transformation in decentralised systems is fundamentally an institutional rather than purely technological process. It proposes an integrated institutional quality framework to strengthen decentralised digital resilience and improve public service delivery across Indonesia’s fragmented governance landscape.
References
Akhyar, M. N., Kartini, D. S., & Herizal. (2024). Trans Metro Pasundan Services: Inter-Campus Transportation in the Public Sector Perspective. Journal of Government and Political Sciences, 1(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.64323/jgps.v1i2.4
Akhyar, M. N., Redjo, S. I., & Kartini, D. S. (2025). The Effectiveness of Digital Population Identity on the Public in the City of Bandung in 2023-2024. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 6(1), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v6i1.45276
Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2023). Challenges of e-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia from an e-ready citizen perspective. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 1039–1045.
Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., & Setianto, W. A. (2021). Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs. Online Information Review, 45(2), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0158
Bertilsson, J. (2023). Organising Stakeholder Participation in Global Climate Governance: The Effects of Resource Dependency and Institutional Logics in the Green Climate Fund. Environmental Values, 32(5), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327123X16759401706498
Branderhorst, E. M., & Ruijer, E. (2024). Digital leadership in local government: an empirical study of Dutch city managers. Local Government Studies, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2363368
Bunker, K., & Negretto, G. L. (2024). The party system effects of unstable electoral rules in Latin America. Party Politics, 30(6), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231196111
Chowdhury, G., & Chowdhury, S. (2024). Towards an agenda for information education and research for sustainable development. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241260711
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fadrial, R., Sujianto, Simanjuntak, H. T. R. F., & Wirman, W. (2024). A Qualitative Study on the Influencing Factors of E-Government Adoption to Improve Public Trust in Local Government: Case Study of Rokan Hulu Municipality. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i3.3931
Fitriyanti, E. (2024). The Effect of Digital Transformation on Governance in Indonesia: A Case Study of e-Government Implementation in Public Services. Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis, 1(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.59261/jpia.v1i1.3
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Flores-Zúñiga, M. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success: Integrating implementation and adoption factors. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101518
Hafel, M. (2023). Digital Transformation in Politics and Governance in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges in the Era of Technological Disruption. Society, 11(2), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.577
Hamka, Y. (2025). The Implementation of E-Government Systems and Their Effect on Bureaucratic Efficiency in Local Government Administration in West Java. Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective, 2(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v2i2.278
Haque, A. (2025). Strengthening Democratic Governance Through Local Government Empowerment in Bangladesh: Challenges and Pathways Forward. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5500639
Herie, S. (2024). Inclusive Strategies to Bridge the Digital Gap: A Case Study of 9 Archipelago Provinces in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(3), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.629-638
Hong, Y. W., Tan Seng Teck, Lim Swee Geok, Reynold Tom Fernandez, Mehdi Tesaloti, Chee How Liau, & Syed Muhammad Fahim. (2025). Digital Governance Frameworks and Transparent Institutions: A Business-Driven Approach to Accountable Institution Development in Sustainable Public Administration. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(S5), 1629–1640. https://doi.org/10.52152/801434
Islam, M. M., & Jahan, N. (2025). The Role of Non-State Actors in Climate Governance: Contributions, Challenges and Future Directions. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(2), 960–998. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i2.1054
Islam, S., & Mohna, H. A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Political Economy Models in South Asia and Their Impact on Public Sector Reform. Review of Applied Science and Technology, 3(1), 01–39. https://doi.org/10.63125/b34gdt94
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government information quarterly, 32(3), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Kemal, A. A., & Shah, M. H. (2024). Digital innovation in social cash organizations – the effects of the institutional interactions for transforming organizational practices. Information Technology & People, 37(5), 2092–2126. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2023-0176
Kibria, M. G., & Hong, P. (2024). E-government in Asian countries: a conceptual framework for sustainable development. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2023-0003
Kim, S., & Shin, S. (2021). Theoretical Frameworks on Tertiary Education Inequality in the SDG Era (pp. 842–853). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95882-8_21
Komarawati, K., Nurdin, M. F., Gunawan, W., & Nurwati, R. N. (2025). Transformative capacity to build an adaptive society resilience during crisis: evidence from conditional cash transfer/PKH Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1507177
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government information quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787
Mutiarin, D., Khaerah, N., Nyssa, A. V. I., & Nasrulhaq, N. (2024). E-Government Development: Catalysing Agile Governance Transformation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 5(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v5i1.270
Nguyen, D. T. N. (2025). Impact of e-government development, economic growth and government management efficiency on financial performance of commercial banks in ASEAN countries. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 9(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-04-2025-0036
Nissen, S. (2021). Political Participation: Inclusion of Citizens in Democratic Opinion-Forming and Decision-Making Processes (pp. 665–675). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3_42
Nur, U., & Nurmandi, A. (2024). Examining the Impact of E-Government Development Index (EGDI) and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI): A Comparative Study of Thailand and The Six Selected ASEAN Countries. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 15(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.15.1.2024.135-160
Nurdiansyah B, A., & Harakan, A. (2025). Reframing Public Governance Through Meta-Governance for Sustainable Development in a Middle-Income Country. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies, 20(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v20i02/161-180
Nurhidayat, N., Nurmandi, A., & Misran, M. (2024). Evaluation of the Challenges of E-Government Implementation: Analysis of the E-Government Development Index in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v8i2.52759
Okitasari, M., & Katramiz, T. (2022). The national development plans after the SDGs: Steering implications of the global goals towards national development planning. Earth System Governance, 12, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100136
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Prabowo, M. R., Maryani, D., W. Kawuryan, 3Megandaru, & Wargadinata, E. (2026). Digital Governance Transformation in Regional Government: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Enhancing Public Service Delivery in Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Architecture Image Studies, 7(1), 1208–1222. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v7i1.1012
Prasojo, E., & Holidin, D. (2018). Leadership and public sector reform in Indonesia. In E. Berman & E. Prasojo (Eds.), Leadership and public sector reform in Asia (pp. 53–83). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720180000030003
Qudus, L. (2025). Cybersecurity governance: Strengthening policy frameworks to address global cybercrime and data privacy challenges. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(1), 1146-1163. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0225
Raiden, A., & King, A. (2021). Social value, organisational learning, and the sustainable development goals in the built environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 172, 105663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105663
Ramadhani, D. P. S., Sulaiman, H. R., Anggraeni, A. W., & Aisyah, S. (2025). The Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Enhancing Public Trust: A Comparative Study Across ASEAN Countries. Journal of Management and Informatics, 4(1), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v4i1.150
Rizwan, A., Naveed, S., & Ahmed, R. (2024). Building Effective Governance, Inclusive Societies, and Strong Institutions: An Assessment of Citizen Participation in Pakistan. In Governance and Sustainable Development in South Asia (pp. 27–48). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67616-1_2
Sakir, A. R. (2025). Public Service Management in Archipelagic Regions: A Systematic Literature Review. EMAS, 6(10), 2509–2518. https://doi.org/10.36733/emas.v6i10.12614
Scott, A. J. (2022). The constitution of the city and the critique of critical urban theory. Urban Studies, 59(6), 1105–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211011028
Setyawan, R., Raharjo, B., & Dewayani, J. (2024). Governance in the Digital Era: Analyzing the Adoption of E-Government Services in Local Authorities Through Quantitative Methods. Journal of Management and Informatics, 3(3), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v3i3.54
Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital Transformation in Governance: The Impact of e-governance on Public Administration and Transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.1.27
Shihab, M. R., Hidayanto, A. N., & Putra, P. H. (2021). Exploring the effects of normative beliefs toward citizen engagement on eparticipation technologies. Information (Switzerland), 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050189
Silva, A. F., Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., & Carvalho, L. C. (2026). Monitoring municipalities’ performance in advancing sustainable development goal 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure. Heliyon, 12(1), e44415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e44415
Sinha, S., Mazwane, S., Makhura, M. N., & du Toit, A. (2024). Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure. In Handbook on Public Policy and Food Security (pp. 223–233). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105449.00027
Sophia Yuliantini, L., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). The The Impact of the E-Government Development Index (EGDI) on the Worldwide Governance Indicator (WGI) in European Union Countries. Policy & Governance Review, 7(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.732
Strilchuk, Y., Krasnova, I., Khodakevich, S., Metsger, I., Stryzhak, A., & Dubas, A. (2024). Sustainable Development Determinants in the Context of Digital Transformation. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(56), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.56.2024.4367
Sukarno, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.106
Szoszkiewicz, L. (2021). Technology, Infrastructure, and Their Regulatory Regimes in Reducing Inequalities (pp. 833–842). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95882-8_108
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Wagola, R., Nurmandi, A., Misran, & Subekti, D. (2023). Government Digital Transformation in Indonesia (pp. 286–296). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36001-5_37
Wahid, M., Rahman, S., Muhammad Yusuf, & Busyairi, M. H. (2024). Unlocking Institutional Capacity for Sustainable E-Government Transformation. Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences, 2(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijcs.v2i3.682
Wang, W., Chen, Y., Sun, H., & Chen, Y. (2021). Multiple binary classification model of trip chain based on the fusion of internet location data and transport data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112298
Widodo, J., & Kusnan, K. (2023). Mapping and Analyzing E-Government Sentiments in Local Governments in Indonesia. Society, 11(2), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.558
Wiryawan, B. A., & Otchia, C. (2022). The legacy of the reformasi: the role of local government spending on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Younus, M., Pribadi, U., Nurmandi, A., & Rahmawati, I. Z. (2023). Comparative analysis of E-Government Development Index: a case study of South Asian countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(4), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2023-0068
Younus, M., Purnomo, E. P., Nurmandi, A., Hung, C.-F., Anand, P., & Khairunnisa, T. (2024). Exploring E-Government Development Index as an Indicator of Sustainability in the Gulf Region. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 11(3), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989241260161
Zahra, A., Anjum, R., & Sultan, I. A. (2024). Public Sector Companies for Sustainable Development: Reform Trajectory of Pakistan’s Lahore Waste Management Company. In Governance and Sustainable Development in South Asia (pp. 239–262). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67616-1_13
Zhao, S., Teng, L., Arkorful, V. E., & Hu, H. (2023). Impacts of digital government on regional eco-innovation: Moderating role of dual environmental regulations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122842
Zhu, J., & Hu, X. (2021). Back to the Iron Cage? Institutional Isomorphism of the AIIB. International Organisations Research Journal, 16(4), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-04-01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wais Alqarni, Safrizal ZA, Isnaini Muallidin, Afrijal Afrijal, M Nur Akhyar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
