The Dynamics of Public Policy-Making in Public Administration: From Classical Management to the New Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v7i1.753Keywords:
Classical Management, Neo-Classical Management, New Public Administration, Public Policy-makingAbstract
This article examines how public administration shapes policy-making. Scholarship typically treats Classical Management, Neo-Classical Management, and New Public Administration (NPA) as successive stages, while policy studies often analyse decision-making, participation, and implementation separately. Consequently, literature lacks an integrated account of how shifting administrative logics structure policy-making and contribute to persistent governance challenges. Drawing on a systematic literature review guided by PRISMA, the study analyses 23 peer-reviewed, Scopus-indexed articles. Rather than aggregating empirical effects, it uses thematic coding to examine policy-making dynamics across paradigms, from Classical Management to NPA. Findings show each paradigm embodies a distinct logic: hierarchical technocratic control in the classical model; behaviourally informed but administratively managed decision-making in the neo-classical model; and collaborative, reflexive governance in the NPA model. Paradigms coexist rather than replace one another. In the Global South, although NPA principles support SDG 16.6 and 16.7, implementation is constrained by neo-classical reforms and residual classical bureaucracies, limiting participatory engagement envisaged by SDG 16.8. Effective governance reform requires aligning institutional capacity with participatory processes rather than adopting a new paradigm.
References
Agrawal, S., Oza, P., Kakkar, R., Tanwar, S., Jetani, V., Undhad, J., & Singh, A. (2024). Analysis and recommendation system-based on PRISMA checklist to write systematic review. Assessing Writing, 61, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100866.
Agruña Barrón, E. M., Belizón Cebada, M. J., & Redondo Palomo, R. (2025). Exploring commonalities in unconventional organization design: evidence from Spanish SME case studies. Journal of Organization Design, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-025-00191-7.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874.
Balzer, L., & Leclercq, L. (2024). Modal dynamic equilibrium under different demand management schemes. Transportation, 51(2), 529–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10338-0.
Billet, B. L. (2023). Navigating Global Environmental Sustainability: Enriching Well-Being in the Wake of the Great-Recession. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978724730.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2020). A new theoretical framework: New developmentalism. Challenge, 63(3), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2019.1705006.
Brint, S., & Ilhan, A. O. (2022). Conceptions of Professionalism in U.S. Research Universities: Evidence from the gradSERU Survey. Minerva, 60(4), 535–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09476-7.
Bueno, D. C., & Salapa, A. (2022). The metamorphosis of management theories from classical to modern: Analysis in the context of public administration. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal–IMRaD Journal, 4. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15413.19688.
Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. L. (2023). The steps to doing a systems literature review (SLR). Journal of Systems Thinking Preprints. https://doi.org/10.54120/jost.pr000019.v1.
Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517.
Choi, T.-H., & Wong, Y.-L. (2024). Does public consultation affect policy formulation? Negotiation strategies between the administration and citizens. Journal of Education Policy, 39(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2269373.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2025). Future Challenges of Public Administration. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2549297.
Coniglio, J. V. (2025). A Theory for All and None: A Neo-Schumpeterian Model of Antitrust Law and Political Economy. JL Econ. & Pol’y, 20, 240. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4927126.
Craft, J., Head, B., & Howlett, M. (2024). Expertise, policy advice, and policy advisory systems in an open, participatory, and populist era: New challenges to research and practice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12630.
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241272921.
Cusimano, A., Mazzola, F., & Barde, S. (2021). Place-based policy in southern Italy: evidence from a dose–response approach. Regional Studies, 55(8), 1442–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1902974.
Eckhard, S. (2021). Bridging the citizen gap: Bureaucratic representation and knowledge linkage in (international) public administration. Governance, 34(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12494.
Farias, G., Farias, C., Krysa, I., & Harmon, J. (2020). Sustainability Mindsets for Strategic Management: Lifting the Yoke of the Neo-Classical Economic Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176977.
Fernandez-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Policy growth, implementation capacities, and the effect on policy performance. Governance, 37(3), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12816.
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x.
Hamilton, P. (2024). The Book Which Increases the Human Efficiency” Taylorism and the Origins of Modern China’s Ideal of “Scientific Management. The Journal of Asian Studies, 83(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-11015891.
Haque, M. S. (2007). Theory and practice of public administration in Southeast Asia: traditions, directions, and impacts. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 30(12–14), 1297–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701229434.
Hart, P., & Kroon, M. B. R. (2024). Groupthink in government: Pathologies of small-group decision making. In Handbook of administrative communication (pp. 101–140). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003574033-5.
Hijriyah, L., Alias, A., & Mohd Sahabuddin, M. F. (2024). Exploring walkability research trends based on systematic literature review (SLR) by applying PRISMA. Open House International, 49(1), 63–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2023-0031.
Hudson, S., & Claasen, C. (2017). Nepotism and cronyism as a cultural phenomenon? In The handbook of business and corruption (pp. 95–118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78635-445-720161006.
Hughes, J., Orr, K., & Yusoff, M. (2023). Strategizing for grand challenges: economic development and governance traditions in Malaysian local government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211048167.
Hurl-Eamon, J. (2023). Enslaved by the uniform: contemporary descriptions of eighteenth-century soldiering. War in History, 30(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221105258.
Issa, A. G., Fagbemi, A. S., Ogunbanjo, B., & Fagbemi, C. A. (2024). Explaining and Understanding Formal and Informal Institutions in the Age of Globalization. African Journal of Humanities and Contemporary Education Research, 17(1), 15–45. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajhcer.2024.016.010430.
Jackson, K. (2023). The Public Trust: Administrative Legitimacy and Democratic Lawmaking. Conn. L. Rev., 56, 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4210691.
Kaldor, M. (2024). The role of arms in capitalist economies: the process of overdevelopment and underdevelopment. In Arms Control and Technological Innovation (pp. 322–341). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003511717-20.
Knafo, S. (2020). Neoliberalism and the origins of public management. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 780–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625425.
Lehtonen, K., Uusikylä, P., Jalonen, H., & Lappalainen, S. (2025). A systems thinking approach for examining the turning points in the Finnish public sport policy. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1591211.
Lejano, R. P., & Kan, W. S. (2025). Conjectures on a relational turn in policy studies. Policy Sciences, 58(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09574-9.
Mhella, D. J. (2025). The classical and neoclassical perspectives: A theoretical framework for studying the advent and growth of mobile money—The Tanzanian experience. Review of Development Economics, 29(1), 105–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13056.
Migone, A., & Howlett, M. (2024). Assessing the ‘forgotten fundamental’ in policy advisory systems research: Policy shops and the role(s) of core policy professionals. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12595.
Mokyr, J. (2008). The institutional origins of the industrial revolution. Institutions and Economic Performance, 64–119. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038578-004.
Moynihan, D. P. (2025). Rescuing state capacity: Proceduralism, the new politicization, and public policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 44(2), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22673.
Muhammad, S., Pan, Y., Magazzino, C., Luo, Y., & Waqas, M. (2022). The fourth industrial revolution and environmental efficiency: The role of fintech industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381, 135196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135196.
Muldoon, J., Gould, A. M., & Joullié, J.-E. (2023). Clipping the wings of theorists: the unacknowledged contribution to management thought from the shopfloor. Management & Organizational History, 18(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2234344.
Nahar, S., Karim, M. S., & Sena, V. (2025). How do unexpected networks help female entrepreneurs in the Global South survive in adverse contexts? A case study of Bangladesh. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70030.
Norman-Major, K. (2023). Balancing the four Es; or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration? In Social Equity in the Public Administration Classroom (pp. 27–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003381228-4.
Ocampo, J. A. (2013). The history and challenges of Latin American development. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.
Omachi, V. O., & Ajewumi, O. E. (2024). The influence of agile organizational design on employee engagement and performance in the digital age. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(10), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2702.
Pandey, V., Sircar, A., Bist, N., Solanki, K., & Yadav, K. (2023). Accelerating the renewable energy sector through Industry 4.0: Optimization opportunities in the digital revolution. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.03.003.
Paquet, M. (2020). Immigration, Bureaucracies and Policy Formulation: The Case of Quebec. International Migration, 58(1), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12555.
Peters, B. G. (2018). The politics of bureaucracy: An introduction to comparative public administration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653.
Peters, B. G. (2021). Administrative traditions: Understanding the roots of contemporary administrative behavior. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297253.001.0001.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
Portillo, S. K., Humphrey, N., & Bearfield, D. A. (2022). The myth of bureaucratic neutrality: An examination of merit and representation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003322795.
Putra, F., Ramadhani, M. F., Rahman, A., Dewi, M. P., & Hamzah, A. (2025). Formulating Social Security Policy Models for Higher Education: A Funding Transformation for Inclusive and Sustainable Higher Education Access. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200704.
Putterman, L. (2025). Herb Gintis on economics and welfare, political economy, and evolution and human behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Economics, 4, 1633414. https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1633414.
Qian, Z. K., & Pun, N. (2025). Labor Market Theory as a Tautology or Theoretical Construct? Toward a Marxist Labor Market Theory. Critical Sociology, 08969205251334111. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251334111.
Rahman, A., & Tuhumury, J. J. (2024). Formulation Model Coastal Tourism Development Policy in a Blue Economy Perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191215.
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3.
Scheer, D., Venghaus, S., Sardo, S., Stark, S., Kuppler, S., Schmidt, M. W., & Hoyer-Klick, C. (2025). No easy way out: towards a framework concept of long-term governance. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 15(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00513-3.
Schwarz, S. K., & Behnke, N. (2025). Urban sustainability commitment: Actor constellations and motivations. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70017.
Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2022). Introducing public administration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191322.
Turner, P. (2022). Complementarity in Organizations: Strategy, leadership, management, talent and engagement in the fourth industrial revolution. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10654-5.
Tuunainen, J., & Kantasalmi, K. (2024). Processing societal expectations: entrepreneurship initiative decision-making at a research university. Higher Education, 87(5), 1251–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01063-3.
Ugyel, L. (2021). Relationship between public sector reforms and culture: The implementation of NPM-related performance management reforms in a collectivist and risk averse culture. Public Administration and Development, 41(5), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1962.
Valeri, M. (2021). Organizational studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87148-2.
van Gestel, N., & Alm Andreassen, T. (2025). Challenging Common Assumptions in Explaining Welfare Administration Reform: A Three-Decade Analysis of The Netherlands and Norway. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2499023.
van Ostaijen, M., & Jhagroe, S. (2022). Making Public Administration great again. Policy Design and Practice, 5(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2101258.
von Lucke, J., & Frank, S. (2025). Potentials of administrative informatics for the analysis of policymaking: notes on the integration of administrative informatics into the policy cycle. Data and Policy, 7. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2025.10010.
Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical Reorientation of Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Public Sector Administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V17I2/WEB17033.
Wang, W. (2023). How does performance management affect social equity? Evidence from New York City public schools. Public Administration Review, 83(5), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13590.
Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (2023). The evolution of management thought. John Wiley & Sons.
Wrońska, I. (2023). Evolution of Canadian immigration policy. The experience of resettlement and measures towards inclusiveness. Problemy Polityki Spolecznej, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.31971/pps/167785.
Wynn, C., Smith, L., & Killen, C. (2025). How the political elite make decisions. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 84(3), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12664.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Rahman, Septi Wulandari, Komang Ema Marsitadewi, Teresa Irmina Nangameka, Shelda Adriana Taimaris Rogi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
