Collaborative Policy Innovation for Accelerating Land Acquisition in the Economic Hub of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v6i2.729Keywords:
Collaborative Policy, Land Acquisition, Multi-Stakeholder CollaborationAbstract
Land acquisition for the public interest in Indonesia frequently encounters complex bureaucracy, inefficiencies, and community resistance, which impede the implementation of National Strategic Projects (NSPs). This study examines policy innovation in land acquisition through multi-stakeholder collaboration in South Sulawesi Province, where Makassar is the provincial capital and the economic hub of eastern Indonesia. The analysis also highlights urban expansion into Gowa Regency, which heightens both the urgency and the complexity of land provision for infrastructure projects. Using a qualitative case-study design, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentary analysis. The findings indicate that collaborative approaches expedite land acquisition, improve transparency, and reduce the risk of social conflict. Models that involve central and local government, private-sector actors, community representatives, and facilitation forums have proved effective in strengthening legitimacy and trust. Strategic recommendations include institutionalising facilitation forums, advancing digital transformation in land-acquisition governance, and reformulating compensation schemes to ensure equity and accountability. By embedding collaboration, transparency, and fairness, the study contributes to more inclusive and responsive public policy while supporting the sustainability of NSPs. It also aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—notably Goal 9 on resilient infrastructure, Goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities, and Goal 16 on strong institutions—offering practical pathways for inclusive and sustainable development.
References
Abujder Ochoa, W. A., Iarozinski Neto, A., Vitorio Junior, P. C., Calabokis, O. P., & Ballesteros-Ballesteros, V. (2024). The Theory of Complexity and Sustainable Urban Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 17(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010003
Adam, A. G. (2020). Understanding competing and conflicting interests for peri-urban land in Ethiopia’s era of urbanization. Environment and Urbanization, 32(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819890215
Alananga, S., Makupa, E., & Matotola, U. (2021). Collaborative Governance in Land Acquisition and Aggregation Practices: The Impacts on Neighbourhood Functionalities in Tanzania. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 14(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v14n2.55
Ameyaw, P. D., & de Vries, W. T. (2021). Toward smart land management: Land acquisition and the associated challenges in Ghana. a look into a blockchain digital land registry for prospects. Land, 10(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030239
Ananda, S. Q., & Sadino, S. (2024). Analisis Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Investasi Pembangunan Rempang Eco-City. Bacarita Law Journal, 4(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v4i2.12732
Andreoletti, M., & Blasimme, A. (2023). Accelerated drug approval: Meeting the ethical yardstick. Bioethics, 37(7), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13191
Andriyani, Y., Suripto, Yohanitas, W. A., Kartika, R. S., & Marsono. (2024). Adaptive innovation model design: Integrating agile and open innovation in regional areas innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100197
Ansell, C., Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Atmoko, D., Susilawati, C., Devi, B., Wilkinson, S., Puspitarini, I., Lukito, J. A., & Goonetilleke, A. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities for Promoting Sustainability in Public Buildings. Sustainability, 17(2), 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020403
Berenschot, W., & Dhiaulhaq, A. (2023). The production of rightlessness: palm oil companies and land dispossession in Indonesia. Globalizations, 7731, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2253657
Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., Müller-Seitz, G., Raab, J., & Sydow, J. (2017). From high-reliability organizations to high-reliability networks: The dynamics of network governance in the face of emergency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 352–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw050
Bokings, J. C. R. (2022). Dispute Settlement Model of Land Acquisition for Public Interest. Damhil Law Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v1i1.1247
Boru, E. M., Hwang, J., & Ahmad, A. Y. (2025). Governance and Institutional Frameworks in Ethiopian Integrated Agro-Industrial Parks: Enhancing Innovation Ecosystems and Multi Stakeholder Coordination for Global Market Competitiveness. Economies, 13(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13030079
Bulmer, E., & Yáñez-Araque, B. (2023). Tackling Climate Change through Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Promoting SDG 17 to Combat Climate Change. Energies, 16(9), 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093777
Candel, M., & Paulsson, J. (2023). Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities. Land Use Policy, 132(June), 106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106764
Cao, W., & Tao, X. (2025). A Study on the Evolutionary Game of the Four-Party Agricultural Product Supply Chain Based on Collaborative Governance and Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(4), 1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041762
Christian, A., Biloa, E., & Gaarde, I. (2024). Promoting inclusive land governance through multi-stakeholder platforms for successful land policy reforms in Africa. Issue 1 African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 7(1), 2657–2664. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i1.45924
D’Ostie-Racine, L., Dagenais, C., & Ridde, V. (2016). A qualitative case study of evaluation use in the context of a collaborative program evaluation strategy in Burkina Faso. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0109-0
Del Soldato, E., & Massari, S. (2024). Creativity and digital strategies to support food cultural heritage in Mediterranean rural areas. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2023-0152
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 717–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2025). Testing theories of policy growth: public demands, interest group politics, electoral competition, and institutional fragmentation. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(3), 784–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2317358
Fitawok, M. B., Derudder, B., Minale, A. S., Van Passel, S., Adgo, E., & Nyssen, J. (2023). Stakeholder perspectives on farmers’ resistance towards urban land-use changes in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Journal of Land Use Science, 18(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2023.2181416
Follmann, A., Kennedy, L., Pfeffer, K., & Wu, F. (2023). Peri-urban transformation in the Global South: a comparative socio-spatial analytics approach. Regional Studies, 57(3), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2095365
Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362610
George, G., Fewer, T. J., Lazzarini, S., McGahan, A. M., & Puranam, P. (2024). Partnering for Grand Challenges: A Review of Organizational Design Considerations in Public–Private Collaborations. Journal of Management, 50(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221148992
Gherheș, V., Grecea, C., Vilceanu, C. B., Herban, S., & Coman, C. (2025). Challenges in Systematic Property Registration in Romania: An Analytical Overview. Land, 14(5), 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051118
Guerrero-Ocampo, S. B., Díaz-Puente, J. M., & Nuñez Espinoza, J. F. (2022). Multi-Actor Partnerships for Agricultural Interactive Innovation: Findings from 17 Case Studies in Europe. Land, 11(10), 1847. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101847
Haq, A. S., Samudra, A. A., & Satispi, E. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara. Sospol, 11(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.22219/jurnalsospol.v11i2.40844
Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. In Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Fricker, R. H., Musso, A., Hausladen, C. I., Carissimo, C., Carpentras, D., Stockinger, E., Argota Sanchez-Vaquerizo, J., Yang, J. C., Ballandies, M. C., Korecki, M., Dubey, R. K., & Pournaras, E. (2023). Democracy by Design: Perspectives for Digitally Assisted, Participatory Upgrades of Society. Journal of Computational Science, 71(March), 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061
Huda, N., Hernandi, A., Gumilar, I., Meilano, I., & Cahyaningtyas, L. A. (2024). The Strategic Development of Quality Improvement Land Data Incrementally Using Integrated PESTEL and SWOT Analysis in Indonesia. Land, 13(10), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101655
Hutama, A. R. (2025). The Public Interest Acquisition of Land for Development. Jurnal Polisci, 2(5), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.62885/polisci.v2i5.769
IFC. (2023). Good Practice Handbook: Land Acquisition and Involuntary Settlement. Good Practice Handbook. www.ifc.org
Irani, Z., Abril, R. M., Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2023). The impact of legacy systems on digital transformation in European public administration: Lesson learned from a multi case analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101784
Jansen, L. J. M., & Kalas, P. P. (2024). Customised Methodology to Assess and Measure Effectiveness of Integrated Landscape Management Relevant Multi-Stakeholder Transformative Governance, Incorporating Rights-Based Planning and Tenure Aspects, Applied in Kenya, Nigeria, and Viet Nam. Sustainability, 16(21), 9312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219312
Kim, K. (2023). Analysing Indonesia’s infrastructure deficits from a developmentalist perspective. Competition & Change, 27(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211043355
Larson, A. M., Sarmiento Barletti, J. P., & Heise Vigil, N. (2022). A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms. World Development, 155, 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105907
Li, F., Du, X., Huang, X., Li, H., & Fei, X. (2025). Social stability risk analysis caused by land acquisition and migration for water conservancy project construction. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 18672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01955-7
Liu, L. X., Clegg, S., & Pollack, J. (2024). The Effect of Public–Private Partnerships on Innovation in Infrastructure Delivery. Project Management Journal, 55(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231189989
MacLean, L. M. (2024). Land Politics: How Customary Institutions Shape State Building in Zambia and Senegal by Lauren Honig (review). In Africa Today (Vol. 71, Issue 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/at.00026
Meckelburg, R., & Wardana, A. (2024). The political economy of land acquisition for development in the public interest: The case of Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 137, 107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107017
Melo, I., & Pijoh, F. E. (2020). The Impact of Legal Land Acquisition for Public Interest. 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201014.045
Nguyen, H. T., Pham, T. H., & de Bruyn, L. L. (2017). Impact of hydroelectric dam development and resettlement on the natural and social capital of rural livelihoods in bo hon village in central vietnam. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081422
Nurhayati, N., & Rahman, A. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Tata Kelola Kolaboratif Dalam Sektor Publik. Jurnal Agregasi : Aksi Reformasi Government Dalam Demokrasi, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.34010/agregasi.v11i1.9207
OECD. (2017). Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges. In Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279865-en
Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, V. (2004). The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(1), 105–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00277.x
Paul, L. (2020). Rural Development in Romania. Sciendo: Studies in Business and Economics, 15(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2020-0032
Păunescu, V., Iliescu, A.-I., Sălăgean, T., Şuba, E.-E., & Nap, M.-E. (2024). An analysis of strategic goals and public procurement strategy regarding the implementation of The National Program for Land Registration in Romania. Land Use Policy, 146(August), 107334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107334
Peters, B. G. (2023). Public administration in authoritarian regimes. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2169820
Pîrvu, R., Dragomir, L., Budică, B., Bratu, R. Ștefan, Dinulescu, S., & Țenea, L. (2022). The Impact of RDP Measures on the Rural Development: The Case of Romania. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8), 4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084857
Purba, M. H. Y., Nasution, S. N., & Nasution, E. S. (2021). Land Acquisition for Public Interests Development: a Human Rights Review. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i1.26760
Roberts, K., Dowell, A., & Nie, J.-B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y
Rudko, I., Bashirpour Bonab, A., Fedele, M., & Formisano, A. V. (2025). New institutional theory and AI: toward rethinking of artificial intelligence in organizations. Journal of Management History, 31(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-09-2023-0097
Salleh, N. A. M., & Peng, S. C. (2022). Striking a Balance Between Public and Private Interests in Land Acquisition: a Cross- Jurisdictional Perspective. IIUM Law Journal, 30(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i1.710
Sejarot, D., & Hariri, A. (2023). Konflik Agraria dalam Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum “ Studi Kasus Desa Wadas Purworejo .” Academos Jurnal Hukum Dan Tatanan Sosial, 2(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.30651/aca.v2i1.15242
Shao, M., Tan-Mullins, M., & Xie, L. (2021). Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)’s sustainable safeguard mechanism on energy projects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 38, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100711
Spiller, N. (2020). Getting to school. In How to Thrive at Architecture School (pp. 4–29). RIBA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003020936-3
Stănică, C. M., & Stănică, V. I. (2024). Rural-urban connectivity through multi-level governance: A review of subnational governments in Romania. Handbook on Subnational Governments and Governance, 327–341. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803925370.00033
Su, Y., Liao, S., & Ren, J. (2025). The stakeholder game mechanisms in land use change of Caohai National Nature Reserve. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 7675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92005-9
Swette, B., Huntsinger, L., & Lambin, E. F. (2023). Collaboration in a polarized context: lessons from public forest governance in the American West. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13958-280129
Syagga, P. M., & Olima, W. H. A. (1996). The impact of compulsory land acquisition on displaced households. Habitat International, 20(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(95)00034-8
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383
Ty, P. H., Laura, B., Phuong, T. T., & Tan, N. Q. (2023). Impoverishment Persistence in Hydropower Dam-Induced Resettled Communities: A Sociological Investigation on Livelihood and Food Security in Vietnam. Social Sciences, 12(4), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12040222
Vercher, N., Bosworth, G., & Esparcia, J. (2023). Developing a framework for radical and incremental social innovation in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 99(January 2022), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.01.007
Wu, F. (2022). Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China. Land Use Policy, 112(April), 104412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104412
Yuliani, E. L., Moeliono, M., Labarani, A., Fisher, M. R., Tias, P. A., & Sunderland, T. (2023). Relational values of forests: Value‐conflicts between local communities and external programmes in Sulawesi. People and Nature, 5(6), 1822–1838. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10389
Zainuddin, Z. (2022). The Legal Due Diligence of Land Acquisition for the Public Interest: A Critical Review. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.159
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 R Agus Marhendra, Siti Aminah, Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Aulia Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
