Cross-Institutional Digitalisation and the Digi-Service Bubble Pitfalls in Public Sector Transformation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v6i1.682Keywords:
Cross-Institutional Digitalisation, Digi-Service Bubble, Public ServicesAbstract
Digitalisation has emerged as a dominant trend in public service delivery, often regarded as a means to reduce costs, improve accessibility and contribute to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 on Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. However, as institutions adopt digital service models, critical questions remain regarding the urgency, effectiveness and potential shortcomings of such reforms. This study examines Indonesia’s public sector amid a wave of digital reforms, exploring the broader implications of cross-institutional digitalisation through the concept of the digi-service bubble. This refers to a condition where the pace of digital adoption exceeds the capacity for strategic planning and meaningful implementation. Data were collected via online surveys involving 50 participants, complemented by in-depth interviews with 20 informants. The research investigates public perceptions of digital services, particularly in relation to their necessity, accessibility and practical effects on everyday governance interactions. The findings highlight three key patterns. First, there is broad consensus on the importance of digitalisation. Second, perceptions vary based on educational background. Third, fragmented digital infrastructure remains a challenge, leading to redundancy and inefficient resource allocation. While digital transformation in public services is broadly supported, long-term success depends on strategic coordination, inclusivity and coherent policymaking. The study underscores the need for integrated digital infrastructure, widespread digital literacy and transparency in governance. These factors are vital to avoiding inefficient or poorly implemented digital initiatives, which typify the digi-service bubble.
References
Abiad, A., Furceri, D., & Topalova, P. (2016). The macroeconomic effects of public investment: Evidence from advanced economies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 50, 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.07.005
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
Alvarenga, A., Matos, F., Godina, R., & C. O. Matias, J. (2020). Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector. Sustainability, 12(14), 5824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145824
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049
Bloomberg, J. (2018, April 29). Digitization, Digitalization, And Digital Transformation: Confuse Them at Your Peril. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2018/04/29/digitization-digitalization-and-digital-transformation-confuse-them-at-your-peril/?sh=9dd1e2e2f2c7
Borst, R. T., & Blom, R. (2021). HRM and well-being in the public sector. In Research Handbook on HRM in the Public Sector: Elgar Handbooks in Public Administration and Management.
BPS. (2021). Telecommunication Statistics in Indonesia 2020. https://www.bps.go.id/en/publication/2021/10/11/e03aca1e6ae93396ee660328/telecommunication-statistics-in-indonesia-2020.html
Bryson, J., & Edwards, L. H. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128
Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., Borcan, I., & Dragan, C. O. (2023). The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on the Digital Transformation of Organizations. Electronics, 12(5), 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12051205
Carpini, M. X. D. (2020). Public Sector Communication and Democracy. In The Handbook of Public Sector Communication (pp. 31–44). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.ch1
Cassia, A. R., Costa, I., da Silva, V. H. C., & de Oliveira Neto, G. C. (2020). Systematic literature review for the development of a conceptual model on the relationship between knowledge sharing, information technology infrastructure and innovative capability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1714026
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
Dal Mas, F., Massaro, M., Lombardi, R., & Garlatti, A. (2019). From output to outcome measures in the public sector: a structured literature review. International journal of organizational analysis, 27(5), 1631-1656. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2018-1523
Di Ubaldo, M., & Siedschlag, I. (2021). Investment in Knowledge‐Based Capital and Productivity: Firm‐Level Evidence from a Small Open Economy†. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(2), 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12464
Ding, J., Liu, B. L., Wang, J. X., Qiao, P., & Zhu, Z. W. (2023). Digitalization of the Business Environment and Innovation Efficiency of Chinese ICT Firms. Journal Of Organizational and End User Computing, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.327365
Dunleavy, P. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Enang, I. (2023). Risk Management and Public Service Reform. In S. Osborne (Ed.), Risk Management and Public Service Reform. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154327
Eriksson, E., & Andersson, T. (2024). The ‘service turn’ in a new public management context: a street-level bureaucrat perspective. Public Management Review, 26(7), 2014–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2241051
Ferlie, E., & Osborne, S. P. (2002). New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects (K. McLaughlin, Ed.). Routledge.
Floridi, L. (2024). Why the AI Hype is Another Tech Bubble. Philosophy & Technology, 37(4), 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00817-w
Gbadegesin, J. T., Ojekalu, S., Gbadegesin, T. F., & Komolafe, M. O. (2021). Sustaining community infrastructure through community-based governance (the social practice of collective design policy). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(4), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2019-0142
Gile, P. P., van de Klundert, J., & Buljac-Samardzic, M. (2022). Strategic human resource management and performance in public hospitals in Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.915317
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Harris, J. A. (2023). Of the origin of government: the afterlives of Locke and Filmer in an eighteenth-century British debate. Intellectual History Review, 33(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2147475
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
Hawrysz, L., & Maj, J. (2017). Identification of stakeholders of public interest organisations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091609
Iqbal, M., Rahmawati, D. E., & Saputro, U. E. (2020). Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia: Best and Bad Practice Perspective. Asian Review, 33(2), 34–54.
Iyamu, I., Xu, A. X. T., Gómez-Ramírez, O., Ablona, A., Chang, H.-J., Mckee, G., & Gilbert, M. (2021). Defining Digital Public Health and the Role of Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation: Scoping Review. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 7(11), e30399. https://doi.org/10.2196/30399
Kompas. (2025). Awal Mula Kasus Dugaan Korupsi PDNS, Picu Serangan Ransomware pada 2024. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2025/03/16/073000765/awal-mula-kasus-dugaan-korupsi-pdns-picu-serangan-ransomware-pada-2024
Lazuardi, L., Sanjaya, G. Y., Ali, P. B., Siahaan, R. G. M., Achmad, L., & Wulandari, H. (2021). Interoperability of Health Digitalization. Business Information Systems, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.52825/bis.v1i.53
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., Smith, K. J., & Wood, R. E. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. Prentice Hall.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Moser-Plautz, B., & Schmidthuber, L. (2023). Digital government transformation as an organizational response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101815
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787
Nadezhina, O., & Avduevskaia, E. (2021). Genesis of Human Capital Theory in the Context of Digitalization. European Conference on Knowledge Management.
Nimer, K., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Schneider, F. (2022). E-government, education quality, Internet access in schools, and tax evasion. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2044587
Nugraheny, D. E., & Ihsanuddin. (2024, May 27). Ada 27.000 Aplikasi Milik Pemerintah, Jokowi: Tidak Terintegrasi dan Tumpang Tindih. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/05/27/12282521/ada-27000-aplikasi-milik-pemerintah-jokowi-tidak-terintegrasi-dan-tumpang
Ouakouak, M. L., Zaitouni, M. G., & Arya, B. (2020). Ethical leadership, emotional leadership, and quitting intentions in public organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0206
Pereira, V., & Bamel, U. (2021). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.021
Philip, J. (2021). Viewing Digital Transformation through the Lens of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 31(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2021.1911573
Plimmer, G., Berman, E. M., Malinen, S., Franken, E., Naswall, K., Kuntz, J., & Löfgren, K. (2022). Resilience in Public Sector Managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20985105
Prakasa, Y., Raharjo, K., & Wiratama, I. D. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Digital Maturity: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Business and Public Administration (AICoBPA 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201116.045
Quinn, W., & Turner, J. D. (2023). Bubbles in history. Business History, 65(4), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2020.1844668
Rasul, I., & Rogger, D. (2018). Management of Bureaucrats and Public Service Delivery: Evidence from the Nigerian Civil Service. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 413–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12418
Richter, A., Heinrich, P., Stocker, A., & Schwabe, G. (2018). Digital Work Design. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0534-4
Rodríguez-Abitia, G., & Bribiesca-Correa, G. (2021). Assessing Digital Transformation in Universities. Future Internet, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020052
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4th ed.). World Economic Forum.
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
Tariverdi, M., Nunez-del-Prado, M., Leonova, N., & Rentschler, J. (2023). Measuring accessibility to public services and infrastructure criticality for disasters risk management. 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28460-z
The Jakarta Post. (2020). Disconnected: Digital divide may jeopardize human rights. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/05/18/disconnected-digital-divide-may-jeopardize-human-rights.html
Tóth-Pajor, A., Bedo, Z., & Csapi, V. (2023). Digitalization in entrepreneurship education and its effect on entrepreneurial capacity building. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.221089
Weerakkody, V., Kapoor, K., Balta, M. E., Irani, Z., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data. Production Planning and Control, 28(11–12), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1336802
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mcafee, A. (2014). The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 1–6.
Yanwardhana, E. (2024a). Update Terbaru Kebocoran 6 Juta Data NPWP, Jokowi Bilang Hal Ini. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20240920144526-37-573358/update-terbaru-kebocoran-6-juta-data-npwp-jokowi-bilang-hal-ini
Yanwardhana, E. (2024b, May 27). Jokowi Kecewa Pusat & Daerah Habiskan Rp6,2 T Buat Bikin Aplikasi. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20240527151234-4-541502/jokowi-kecewa-pusat-daerah-habiskan-rp62-t-buat-bikin-aplikasi
Yigitbasioglu, O., Green, P., & Cheung, M. Y. D. (2023). Digital transformation and accountants as advisors. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(1), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3894
Ziyang, P., & Shan, L. (2021). John Locke’s Doctrine of Limited Government: Establishment, Limitations and Criticisms. Advances in Politics and Economics, 4(3), p25–p25. https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v4n3p25
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ondy Asep Saputra, Arif Nugroho, Duratul Ain Tholibon, Rudi Salam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
