Democratic Decentralization and Participatory Development: Focus on Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v1i2.23Keywords:
Democratic Decentralization, Participation, Development, Asia, BangladeshAbstract
In recent decades, developing Asian nations have witnessed the emergence of democratic decentralized governance structures, and with it a shift towards a more people-centric approach to development. Proponents claim the new approach can humanize bureaucracies and provide solutions to problems of poverty and social inequity. Despite their popularity, difficulties in implementation have been found, and questions are now being asked about the ‘real’ effectiveness of such frameworks. Discussing first the tenets of participatory development and its symbiotic relationship with democratic decentralized on this paper looks at the challenges faced in decentralizing a decentralized participatory framework and the critical components needed for success. It draws on examples from within developing Asia to highlight the many complexities of the issue, such as different cultural beliefs, political forces, administrative arrangements and varying perceptions. It argues that where incorrectly implemented, a decentralized participatory structure can prove ineffective for local people, in some cases leading to practical disillusions and further disadvantage.
References
Abbass, D. (2004). Decentralisation in forestry continues despite disappointments. Appropriate Technology, 31(3), 32.
Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.
Balooni, K., & Inoue, M. (2007). Decentralized forest management in South and Southeast Asia. Journal of Forestry, 105(8), 414–420.
Chambers, R. (2013). Participation for development: A good time to be alive. Development Bulletin, 75, 4–9.
Guess, G. M. (2005). Comparative decentralization lessons from Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 217–230.
Hussein, K. (1995). Participatory ideology and practical development: agency control in a fisheries project, Kariba lake. In Power and Participatory Development. Theory and Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Keough, N. (1998). Participatory development principles and practice: Reflections of a western development worker. Community Development Journal, 33(3), 187–196.
Kumar, S. (2002). Does “participation” in common pool resource management help the poor? A social cost–benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand, India. World Development, 30(5), 763–782.
Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing.
Lane, J. (1995). Non-governmental organizations and participatory development: the concept in theory versus the concept in practice. In Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Lavigne-Delville, P., Sellamna, N.-E., & Mathieu, M. (2005). Living up to ambitions: For a more rigorous practice of participatory appraisals and inquiries. In A. Neef (Ed.), Participatory Development: Theory and Practice (pp. 170–180). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Loh, F. K. W. (2008). Procedural democracy, participatory democracy and regional networking: the multi‐terrain struggle for democracy in Southeast Asia. Inter‐Asia Cultural Studies, 9(1), 127–141.
Midgley, J. (1986). Community Participation, Social Development and the State. New York: Methuen & Co.
Mohan, G. (2007). Participatory development: from epistemological reversals to active citizenship. Geography Compass, 1(4), 779–796.
Mun˜oz, L. G. C., Acosta, A. J. O., & Moreno, L. D. (2006). Aspectos ba´ sicos de la descentralizacio´n en Me´xico. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y el Desarrollo Municipal.
Nagel, U., Heidhues, F., Horne, P., & Neef, A. (2004). Participatory approaches for sustainable land use in Southeast Asia: Lessons learned and challenges remaining. In A. Neef (Ed.), Participatory Approaches for Sustainable Land Use in Southeast Asia (pp. 359–370). Bangkok: White Lotus Press.
Parfitt, T. (2004). The ambiguity of participation: a qualified defence of participatory development. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 537–555.
Paul, S. (1987). Community participation in development projects. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Reid, B. (2005). Poverty alleviation and participatory development in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 35(1), 29–52.
Rondinelli, D. A., & Nellis, J. R. (1986). Assessing decentralization policies in developing countries: The case for cautious optimism 1. Development Policy Review, 4(1), 3–23.
Rondinelli, D. A., Nellis, J. R., & Cheema, G. S. (1983). Decentralization in developing countries. In World Bank staff working paper (Vol. 581).
Thomas, P. (2013). Introduction: Challenges for participatory development in contemporary development practice. Development Bulletin, 75.
Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2012). Managing development in a globalized world: Concepts, processes, institutions. Florida: CRC Press.
Zafarullah, H. M. (2004). Decentralized governance and participatory development: The asian experience. In Handbook of development policy studies. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
Zafarullah, H. M., & Huque, A. S. (2006). Understanding development governance: concepts, institutions, and processes. In International development governance. CRC Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
