Penta Helix Collaboration in Developing Social Inclusion for Persons with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v5i1.105Keywords:
Collaboration, Penta Helix, Persons with Disabilities, Social InclusionAbstract
This research examines collaboration between the government, community, academia, entrepreneurs and the media, known as the ‘penta helix’, in developing social inclusion for persons with disabilities (PwD) in Indonesia. This descriptive and qualitative study collects data through observation, focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The research informants were determined purposively from representatives of the penta helix who were seen as understanding or having the authority to interact with PwD. For data analysis, Miles and Huberman’s interactive analysis model was employed. Regarding the five areas of the penta helix, the study found that the government exercised political power through the issuance of Regional Regulation 9 of 2020 concerning the protection and fulfilment of the rights of PwD. The regulation aims to ensure that PwD receive the same rights and opportunities as other citizens. The community has a role as social power through creating care classes for PwD for people to understand the culture and self-development of PwD. Academics function as a knowledge power by developing campus inclusion standards and collaborating with national and international funding institutions to carry out the three pillars of higher education on the issue of PwD. Industry plays a role as social justice power in supporting the provision of venture capital assistance and work skills training for PwD. The media holds the power of brand image so that discriminatory views against PwD transform into fulfilling the rights of PwD. Understanding stakeholders’ role in the penta helix collaboration helps develop a social inclusion model for PwD.
References
Albers, S., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). Strategic Alliance Structures. Journal of Management, 42(3), 582–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488209
Allifya, S. A. N., Aknuranda, I., & Amiruddin, L. (2022). Designing an Accessibility Portal for a Higher Education Institution. IJDS Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(02), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2022.009.02.05
Anderson, E. T., & McFarlane, J. (2019). Community as Partner Theory and Practice in Nursing 4th Ed. Wolters Kluwer.
Banas, J. R., Magasi, S., The, K., & Victorson, D. E. (2019). Recruiting and Retaining People with Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions. Qualitative Health Research, 29(7), 1056–1064.
Bartley, T. (2022). Power and the Practice of Transnational Private Regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202.
Burke, T. F., & Barnes, J. (2018). Layering, kludgeocracy and disability rights: The limited influence of the social model in American disability policy. Social Policy and Society, 17(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000367
Canton, E., Hedley, D., & Spoor, J. R. (2023). The stereotype content model and disabilities. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(4), 480–500.
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management, 46(6), 965–1001.
Chamidah, N., Putra, A. H. P. K., Mansur, D. M., & Guntoro, B. (2021). Pentahelix element synergy as an effort to develop villages tourism in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 8(1), 01–22.
Cheyne, R. (2019). Disability, Literature, Genre. Liverpool University Press.
Demartoto, A. (2005). Menyibak Sensivitas Gender dalam Keluarga Difabel. UNS Press.
F. Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(5), 211–224.
Fakih, M. (1999). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.
Garcia, O., & Cater, C. (2022). Life below water; challenges for tourism partnerships in achieving ocean literacy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(10), 2428–2447.
Halibas, A., Sibayan, R. O., & Maata, R. L. R. (2017). The Pentahelix model of innovation in Oman: an HEI perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, 12(1), 159–172.
Hammad, I. (2004). Konstruksi Realitas Politik dalam Media Massa. Granit.
Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 206–217.
Huang, J., Cook, G. G., & Xie, Y. (2021). Large-scale quantitative evidence of media impact on public opinion toward China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00846-2
ILO. (2018). Mempromosikan Hak dan Kesempatan bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia (Kemitraan PBB untuk Mempromosikan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas/UNPRPD). ILO.
Indriyany, I. A. (2015). Pelayanan Publik dan Pemenuhan Hak Difabel: Studi tentang Layanan Pendidikan Inklusif Melalui Kasus Pemindahan Difabel dari Sekolah Reguler ke Sekolah Luar Biasa di Yogyakarta. INKLUSI, 2(1), 1–20.
Jabeen, F., Belas, J., Santoro, G., & Alam, G. M. (2023). The role of open innovation in fostering SMEs’ business model innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(6), 1562–1582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2022-0347
Kim, H. C., & Zhu, Z. Y. (2020). Improving social inclusion for people with physical disabilities: The roles of mobile social networking applications (MSNA) by disability support organizations in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072333
Kiryakova, A. V., Kolga, V. V., Yumatov, A. S., Smorchkova, V. P., Romanova, E. N., Tuganov, Y. N., & Fedulov, V. I. (2020). Student Representation of Mass Media as Tool for Forming Public Opinion. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7934
Komninos, N., & Kakderi, C. (2019). Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907056
Krahn, G. L., Putnam, M., Drum, C. E., & Powers, L. (2006). Disabilities and health: Toward a national agenda for research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(1), 18–27.
Lestari, E. Y., Sumarto, S., & Isdaryanto, N. (2017). Pemenuhan Hak Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Di Kabupaten Semarang Melalui Implementasi Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabillities (CPRD) Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Integralistik, 28(1), 1–9.
Lindeke, L. L., & Sieckert, A. M. (2005). Nurse-physician workplace collaboration. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3912/ojin.vol10no01man04
Lindsay, S., Fuentes, K., Tomas, V., & Hsu, S. (2023). Ableism and Workplace Discrimination Among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 33(1), 20–36.
Little, C., DeLeeuw, R. R., Andriana, E., Zanuttini, J., & David, E. (2020). Social Inclusion through the Eyes of the Student: Perspectives from Students with Disabilities on Friendship and Acceptance. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 69(6), 2074–2093.
Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2022). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(1), 114–130.
Maini, A., & Heera, S. (2019). Exploring Disability Inclusion in Organizations through Managerial Lens. Vision, 23(2), 144–151.
Martin Ginis, K. A., van der Ploeg, H. P., Foster, C., Lai, B., McBride, C. B., Ng, K., Pratt, M., Shirazipour, C. H., Smith, B., Vásquez, P. M., & Heath, G. W. (2021). Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective. The Lancet, 398(10298), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01164-8
Mason, M. (1990). Disability Equality in the Classroom‐a human rights issue. Gender and Education, 2(3), 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025900020311
Maturbongs, E., & Lekatompessy, R. (2020). Kolaborasi Model Pentahelix Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Kabupaten Merauke. Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 3(1), 55–63.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Muhyi, H. A., & Chan, A. (2017). The Penta Helix Collaboration Model in Developing Centers of Flagship Industry in Bandung City. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(1), 412–417.
Muklis, A., Hidayat, M. T., & Nariyah, H. (2022). Collaborative Governance Pentahelix dalam Proses Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (AMDAL) di Kabupaten Cirebon. Ijd-Demos, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i1.202
Nurhayati, S. (2020). Social Inclusion for Persons with Disabilities Through Access to Employment in Indonesia. Prophetic Law Review, 2(1), 1–21.
Santoso, M. B., & Apsari, N. C. (2017). Pergeseran Paradigma dalam Disabilitas. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 1(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v1n2.6
Sholeh, A. (2015). Islam dan Penyandang Disabilitas : Telaah Hak Aksesibilitas Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Palastren, 8(2), 293–320.
Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29.
Subagyo, A. (2021). The implementation of the pentahelix model for the terrorism deradicalization program in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1).
Sudiana, K., Sule, E. T., Soemaryani, I., & Yunizar, Y. (2020). The development and validation of the penta helix construct. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11231
Tarvainen, M. (2021). Loneliness in life stories by people with disabilities. Disability & Society, 36(6), 864–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1779034
Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187–1211.
Whitford, A. B., Lee, S.-Y., Yun, T., & Jung, C. S. (2010). Collaborative Behavior and the Performance of Government Agencies. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.529378
Whitford, B, A., Lee, S.-Y., Yun, T., & Jung, C. S. (2018). Collaborative Behavior and the Performance of Government Agencies. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 321–349.
Wicaksana, D. A. (2017). The Role of Indonesian CSOs in Increasing the Understanding of Disabled Issues in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 1(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v1i2.6135
Windiani, W. (2021). Pentahelix Collaboration Approach in Disaster Management: Case Study on Disaster Risk Reduction Forum-East Java. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 7, 71. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i7.9540
Wisudayati, T. A., Hidayat, D. C., & Hendarto, K. (2020). Implementation of Pentahelix Collaboration Model in the Development of Government Institution’s Potency as General Services Agency. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea, 9(1), 13–22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
