Political Dynamics of Cybersecurity Policy in Indonesia: A Governmentality Analysis under Joko Widodo’s Administration (2014-2024)

Authors

  • Anggi Anggraeni Kusumoningtyas Department of Government Studies, Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
  • Syarkawi Syarkawi Department of Public Administration, Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46507/jclp.v4i2.800

Keywords:

State Power, Political Dynamics, Cybersecurity, Governmentality, Digital Governance

Abstract

This article examines Indonesia’s cybersecurity policy during the Joko Widodo administration (2014–2024) through the lens of Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality. As cyberspace has increasingly been constructed as a strategic domain of governance, the Indonesian state has framed cyber threats as risks to national security, digital sovereignty, and political stability. This framing has justified the expansion of regulatory authority, institutional consolidation, and digital surveillance practices. Using a qualitative document analysis approach, this study analyzes cybersecurity-related laws, presidential regulations, national cybersecurity strategies, and official reports issued by state institutions, particularly the National Cyber and Crypto Agency. The findings demonstrate that cybersecurity policy in Indonesia functions not merely as a technical mechanism to protect digital infrastructure, but also as a political technology of governance. Through the production of threat discourses, the deployment of governing technologies, and the shaping of digital subjectivities, cybersecurity policy operates as a form of population management that encourages self-regulation and compliance among citizens. Drawing on governmentality theory, this article argues that cybersecurity governance reflects broader state strategies to regulate conduct in the digital sphere rather than simply respond to technical risks. The study contributes to debates on digital governance and local politics by highlighting how cybersecurity policy in a democratic developing country simultaneously enhances state capacity while generating tensions with democratic accountability, civil liberties, and digital rights.

References

Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012

Bilan, Y., Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., & Skare, M. (2023). Impact of information and communications technology on the development and use of knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122519

Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2018). Challenging Truth and Trust: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation. Computational Propaganda Research Project, 1(3), 26pp. http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2018/07/ct2018.pdf

Camini, A. (2022). Resenha: “Do Morals Matter? Presidents and foreign policy from FDR to Trump.” In Conjuntura internacional (Vol. 18, Issue 2). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5752/p.1809-6182.2021v18n2p2-3

Canton, H. (2021). International telecommunication union—ITU. In The Europa directory of international organizations 2021 (pp. 355–358). Routledge.

Cavelty, M. D. (2007). Cyber-Security and Threat Politics: US Efforts to Secure the Information Age. In Cyber-Security and Threat Politics: US Efforts to Secure the Information Age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937419

Cavelty, M. D. (2018). Cybersecurity research meets science and technology studies. Politics and Governance, 6(2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1385

Cavelty, M. D., & Wenger, A. (2020). Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678855

Chandler, D. (2019). Resilience and the end(s) of the politics of adaptation. Resilience, 7(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2019.1605660

Christou, G. (2016). Cybersecurity in the European Union Resilience and Adaptability in Governance Policy. In New Security Challenges (pp. 1–222). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1160892

Cresswell, J. W., & Cheryl, P. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications. https://keithrkenney.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/creswellcritique.pdf

Dean, M. M. (2010). Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Choice Reviews Online, 47(11), 47-6521-47–6521. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-6521

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00351

Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population (M. Senellart, F. Ewald, & A. Fontana (eds.)). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075

Fuster, G. G., & Jasmontaite, L. (2020). Cybersecurity Regulation in the European Union: The Digital, the Critical and Fundamental Rights. In M. Christen, B. Gordijn, & M. Loi (Eds.), The Ethics of Cybersecurity (pp. 97–115). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29053-5_5

Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information Communication and Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914

Hampson, F. O., Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. de. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. In International Journal (Vol. 53, Issue 4). Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203739

Hilbert, M. (2014). How much of the global information and communication explosion is driven by more, and how much by better technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 856–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23031

Hollanek, T. (2021). Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. In Design Issues (Vol. 37, Issue 4). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_r_00662

Kusumoningtyas, A. A. (2023). Nexus Pengawasan Siber Sebagai Instrumen Keamanan Nasional Dan Relevansinya Dengan Demokrasi: Perbandingan Beberapa Negara. Jurnal Adhikari, 2(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.53968/ja.v2i3.80

Kusumoningtyas, A. A., & Puspitasari, P. (2020). Dilema Hak Perlindungan Data Pribadi Dan Pengawasan Siber: Tantangan Di Masa Depan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i2.706

Liang, J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact: by S. J. Tracy, West Sussex, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 368 pp., $115.50 (hardback), ISBN: 978-1-4051-9202-3. In Communication Research and Practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–2). Taylor & Francis.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Liu, S. M., & Yuan, Q. (2015). The Evolution of Information and Communication Technology in Public Administration. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1717

Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2017). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. In Foucault and law (pp. 191–224). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/591464

Shi, J., & Feng, G. (2024). Do moral matters?: Presidents and Foreign policy from FDR to Trump Do moral matters?: Presidents and Foreign policy from FDR to Trump , by Joseph S. Nye, Oxford University. Critical Policy Studies, 18, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2340660

Steinbach, A. (2024). Digital sovereignty. List Forum Fur Wirtschafts- Und Finanzpolitik, 50(1–2), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41025-023-00252-3

Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666428

Zuboff, S. (2023). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 203–213). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-27

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31