Village Head Election Contention and Governance Disruption: A Case Study of Benteng, East Luwu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jclp.v5i1.762Keywords:
Local Politics, Village Governance , Electoral Contention, Elite Capture, Deliberative ParticipationAbstract
This article examines how electoral contention in village head elections disrupts day-to-day village governance. Framed around the question of how political competition affects administrative stability at the village level, the study conceptualizes elections as a governance stress test. Using a qualitative single-case study of Benteng Village in East Luwu, Indonesia, the research draws on semi-structured interviews, direct observation, and analysis of village budget documents from 2019-2021.The findings reveal three interconnected mechanisms of governance disruption. First, intense electoral contestation undermined organizational cohesion within the village apparatus through loyalty pressures and staff instability. Second, post-election governance was marked by elite-dominated deliberation, weakening inclusive participation, particularly among women and youth. Third, electoral dynamics reshaped budget priorities and exposed integrity vulnerabilities, contributing to administrative delays and declining public trust. The article contributes theoretically by linking electoral contention to governance performance through a mechanism as based framework, extending debates on clientelism, participatory governance, and collaborative capacity. Practically, it highlights the need for neutral leadership transitions, strengthened deliberative safeguards, and proactive transparency to protect village governance from electoral shocks.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
Ardhana, I. K., & Wardi, I. N. (2026). Adat, People Power and Religious Values: Sources of Social Resilience from the Early to Middle 19th Century in Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 12(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2022.v12.i01.p11
Ariza Marín, D., Goda, T., & Tabares Pozos, G. (2021). Political competition, electoral participation and local fiscal performance. Development Studies Research, 8(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2021.1872394
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale. In Cornell University Press. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501732997
Aspinall, E., & Warburton, E. (2018). Indonesia: The Dangers of Democratic Regression. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICSPS 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icsps-17.2018.1
Batley, R., & Mcloughlin, C. (2015). The Politics of Public Services: A Service Characteristics Approach. World Development, 74, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.018
Beck, E. (2016). Repopulating Development: An Agent-Based Approach to Studying Development Interventions. World Development, 80, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.019
Bio, R. K., & Dupras, J. (2023). Analysis of the Institutional Framework for the Management of Community Areas Through the Prism of Institutional Bricolage: The Case of Benin’s Bouche du Roy. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1251
Bordandini, P., Maltagliati, M., Bellanca, N., & Cartocci, R. (2024). Disgruntled Italians – social capital and civic culture in Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 29(2), 206–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2023.2288430
Cornwall, A. (2016). Women’s Empowerment: What Works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3210
De Waal, A. (2015). The real politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, war and the business of power. John Wiley & Sons.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good Governance, R.I.P.: A Critique and an Alternative. Governance, 30(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12223
He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711000892
Hickey, S., Lavers, T., Niño-Zarazúa, M., & Seekings, J. (2019). The Politics of Social Protection in Eastern and Southern Africa (S. Hickey, T. Lavers, M. Niño-Zarazúa, & J. Seekings (eds.)). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850342.001.0001
Leftwich, A. (2010). Beyond Institutions: Rethinking the Role of Leaders, Elites and Coalitions in the Institutional Formation of Developmental States and Strategies. Forum for Development Studies, 37(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410903558327
Lewis, B. D. (2017). Does local government proliferation improve public service delivery? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(8), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1323544
Li, Y., Fan, P., & Liu, Y. (2019). What makes better village development in traditional agricultural areas of China? Evidence from long-term observation of typical villages. Habitat International, 83, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.006
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0627
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Systems (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002
Mary, S., Shaw, K., & Paloma, S. G. y. (2019). Does the sectoral composition of growth affect child stunting reductions? Development Policy Review, 37(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12349
Mersha, A. A., & van Laerhoven, F. (2018). The interplay between planned and autonomous adaptation in response to climate change: Insights from rural Ethiopia. World Development, 107, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.001
Nazneen, S. (2023). Women’s political agency in difficult settings: Analysis of evidence from Egypt, Nigeria, Mozambique, and Pakistan. Development Policy Review, 41(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12685
Ojha, H., Maheshwari, B., Camkin, J., Bhattarai, B., Banjade, P., Gurung, P., Delfau, K., Narain, V., Allen, W., Ransom, S., Singh, V., Rathod, R., Dahal, N., Neto, S., Giri, M., Rai, S. P., & Adeline, I. (2025). From Dialogue to Policy Learning: Water Policy Labs for Transformative Water Governance. World Water Policy, 11(4), 969–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.70041
Pierskalla, J. H., & Sacks, A. (2020). Personnel Politics: Elections, Clientelistic Competition and Teacher Hiring in Indonesia. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000601
Priya, A. (2021). Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Ramos, F., Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2026). Between promise and practice: a scoping review of the democratic outcomes of youth participation in local governance. Children and Youth Services Review, 181, 108738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108738
Rao, V., & Sanyal, P. (2010). Dignity through Discourse: Poverty and the Culture of Deliberation in Indian Village Democracies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209357402
Sidel, J. T. (2014). Economic foundations of subnational authoritarianism: insights and evidence from qualitative and quantitative research. Democratization, 21(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.725725
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107324909
Sutiyo, & Maharjan, K. L. (2017). Decentralization and Rural Development in Indonesia. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3208-0
Tang, M., & Huhe, N. (2016). The Variant Effect of Decentralization on Trust in National and Local Governments in Asia. Political Studies, 64(1), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12177
Tria Kerkvliet, B. J. (2009). Everyday politics in peasant societies (and ours). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820487
Ukeje, I. O., Suzana, O. R., Ejem, E. N., Akor, I. C., Aloh, J. N., Arinze, A. I., & Nwangbo, S. O. (2026). Stakeholder Engagement and Policy Legitimacy in Agricultural Development: A Dynamic Stakeholder Governance Innovation Perspective from Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2026.2641816
Ylikoski, P., & Zahle, J. (2019). Case study research in the social sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 78, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.10.003
Ziorklui, B. E. A., Okyere, S. A., Abunyewah, M., Mensah, S. L., & Frimpong, L. K. (2024). Social capital and community-driven development: A multi-group analysis of migrant and indigenous informal settlements in Greater Accra, Ghana. Habitat International, 145, 103016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103016
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yusriah Amaliah Amaliah, Andi M ferian Maha Putra Parial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Journal of Contemporary Local Politics agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
