Navigating Political Beliefs at the Grassroots: A Study of Civil Servants' Perceptions on Democracy and Radicalism in Murung Raya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jclp.v4i1.711Keywords:
political belifes, civil servant, democracy, radicalismAbstract
This study investigates the political beliefs of civil servants in Murung Raya Regency, focusing on their perceptions of democracy, presidentialism, and radical ideological discourse. Grounded in Norris and Inglehart’s Cultural Backlash Theory (2019), the research explores how local bureaucrats respond to ideological shifts and sociopolitical tensions in contemporary Indonesia. Employing a quantitative design, the study surveyed 64 government employees through a structured questionnaire administered after a civic education session. The findings indicate that 82.8% of respondents support the presidential system and the separation of powers, while 79.7% agree that Indonesia’s democratic system, despite its flaws, should be preserved. Notably, 96.9% reject radical ideologies such as the caliphate, affirming the resilience of Pancasila as the state ideology. Moreover, 89.1% prefer presidential governance, and 42.2% favor military-background leaders for national leadership, suggesting a cultural orientation toward political stability. These results confirm the relevance of Cultural Backlash Theory in explaining grassroots political attitudes shaped by modernization anxieties and ideological contestation. This study contributes to the discourse on democratic resilience, offering empirical insights into the beliefs of civil servants who act as frontline agents of the state in safeguarding democratic values at the local level.
References
Ahmad, N. (2024). What Drive Marketization and Professionalization of Campaigning of Political Parties in the Emerging Democracy? Evidence from Indonesia in the Post-Soeharto New Order. Journal of Political Marketing, 23(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1910610
Aminah, S., HS, T., & Maemunah, S. (2021). The Politicization of the Bureaucracy in Local Government (Case Study in Indonesia). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306284
Aspinall, E., & Mas’Udi, W. (2017). The 2017 pilkada (local elections) in Indonesia: Clientelism, programmatic politics and social networks. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(3), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-3a
Astley, J. (2025). Ideological idiosyncrasies and individual-level radicalisation pathways: unpacking the mutating dynamics of contemporary extremism. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 5330(May), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2025.2502580
Bahrul Khoir, A. (2021). Radikalisme Dan Aparatur Sipil Negara: Faktor Penyebab Dan Upaya Pemerintah Menangani Radikalisme Pada Aparatur Sipil Negara. Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 12(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v12i2.3938
Balkin, J. M. (2017). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. In Popular Culture and Law (pp. 437–494). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351154161-9
Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1838
Bryant, C., & White, L. G. (2019). Administrative Behavior. In Managing Development in the Third World. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052125-6
Cahyono, S. (2023). Efektivitas Presidential Threshold Dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Dalam Sistem Multi Partai. Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan, 1(1), 1–12.
Cedro, E. (2024). Monarchical Influence on Governance : Stability , Tradition , and Modern Democratic Integration. IInfluence: Internation Journal of Schinece Reviewinece Review, 6(2), 178–187.
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
Domingues, J. M. (2022). Extreme-right, democracy and oligarchy. Revista Euro Latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP), 2(3), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.v2i3.10
Gliem, J. a, & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales,. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 1992, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9792
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
Hardenta, A. D. (2024). The Regional Government Leaders Ambiguous Position and Political Influence in Indonesia’s Civil Servant Management. South-East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ ALGOV), 1(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.22146/seajalgov.v1i1.10153
Harnois, Y. G., & Gagnon, S. (2022). Fighting corruption in international development: a grounded theory of managing projects within a complex socio-cultural context. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(5), 677–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-06-2021-0195
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
Jebb, A. T., Ng, V., & Tay, L. (2021). A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547
Malik, A. A. (2023). Parliamentary Democracy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and the Quest for Effective Governance. Revista Review Index Journal of Multidisciplinary, 3(4), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2023.v03.n04.001
McLean, E. K. (2023). The Un-’Common Sense’ of National Identity: Luigi Molina, Trentini and the Fascist Italianisation Campaign in Trentino-Alto Adige/SÜdtirol. Contemporary European History, 14(3), 1094–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777323000139
McMann, K., Pemstein, D., Seim, B., Teorell, J., & Lindberg, S. (2022). Assessing Data Quality: An Approach and An Application. Political Analysis, 30(3), 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.27
Mukhlis, M., Ulzikri, A. R., & Widianto, A. (2021). The Implementation of Nahdlatul Ulama’s Moderation Philosophy in Treating Islamic Fundamentalism in Bandar Lampung. Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 21(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v21i1.2679
Muñoz, E. (2021). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. In Brazilian Political Science Review (Vol. 15, Issue 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202100010007
Prothro, J. W., & Grigg, C. M. (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. The Journal of Politics, 22(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2127359
Purwanto, J. H. (2020). Analisis Budaya Kerja Aparatur Sipil Negara: Studi Kasus Pada Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 59–81. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.32834/jpap.v2i2.237
Schimmelfennig, F. (2010). The normative origins of democracy in the European Union: Toward a transformationalist theory of democratization. European Political Science Review, 2(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000068
Septiani, E. (2023). Analisis Terhadap Upaya Penguatan Implementasi Kebijakan Netralitas ASN dalam Pemilu. Ebisma (Economics, Business, Management, & Accounting Journal), 3(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.61083/ebisma.v3i1.24
Sugawara, E., & Nikaido, H. (2014). Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK efflux systems of Acinetobacter baumannii compared with those of the AcrAB-TolC system of Escherichia coli. In A. MArks (Ed.), Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (5th ed., Vol. 58, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03728-14
Suryana, A. (2020). Challenges in Tackling Extremism in the Indonesian Civil Service. In Challenges in Tackling Extremism in the Indonesian Civil Service. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951289
Ul’zikri, A. R., & Annisa, S. N. (2024). Demokrasi Di Tempat Kerja : Analisis Diskursus Melalui Pendekatan Classroom Action Research. Wacana: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Interdisiplin, 11(02), 764–776. https://doi.org/10.37304/wacana.v11i2.17525
van Berkel, M., El Cheikh, N. M., Kennedy, H., & Osti, L. (2013). Crisis and Continuity at the Abbasid Court. In Crisis and Continuity at the Abbasid Court. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252707
Wahyuni, T., & Noor Permadi, R. (2018). Penguatan Kode Etik Organisasi Dalam Mewujudkan Netralitas Asn. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.52316/jap.v14i2.9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Robi Ul'zikri, Bismar Harris Satriawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Journal of Contemporary Local Politics agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
