Local Political Power in The Legislation Process

Authors

  • Ahmad Rizali Pawane Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena
  • Mohammad Safrul Wijaya Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena
  • Ilham Ilham Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46507/jclp.v2i2.462

Keywords:

Local Political, Legislative Process, Political Power

Abstract

The democratic system adopted by Indonesia gives a central role to political parties as the main instrument in realizing a democratic state life. This research aims to reveal the political forces that often occur in the legislative process of making regulations in Indonesia. Using a qualitative-descriptive interpretive method and a phenomenological approach, this research explores the political forces involved in legislative making by the executive and legislature. The results show that in regulation-making, there is a power gap between the executive and the legislature. The political power of the executive tends to be dominant because they are the highest power holder. It cannot be denied that there are interests of actors in it who seek to maintain and expand their power. The formation of legal products involves the influence of political power through political processes in state institutions that have authority and power. In addition, this research reveals the political dynamics that occur in the legislative process, where the interaction between the executive and the legislature is a crucial factor. This political process includes negotiations, compromises, and competing interests between the various parties involved. Thus, regulation-making is not only the result of technical considerations and community needs, but also influenced by the dynamics of political power at the local level.

References

Agassi, M. A., Hendrawan, R., & Mubarak, A. A. (2023). Analisis Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10282684

Anderson, S. E., DeLeo, R. A., & Taylor, K. (2020). Policy Entrepreneurs, Legislators, and Agenda Setting: Information and Influence. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 587–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12331

Bhakti, T. S. (2017). Politik Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim (The Politic of Law in a Verdict). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.53-72

Chindarkar, N., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue: “Conceptualizing Effective Social Policy Design: Design Spaces and Capacity Challenges.” Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1789

Chu, PH. and Chang, Y. (2017). John W, Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(June), 3–5.

Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis. routledge.

Fikri, S. (2018). Politik Identitas dan dan penguatan Demokrasi Lokal (Kekuatan Wong kito dalam demokrasi lokal). TAMADDUN: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Islam, 18(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.19109/tamaddun.v18i2.2701

Gandhi, J., Noble, B., & Svolik, M. (2020). Legislatures and Legislative Politics Without Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), 1359–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020919930

Handoko, B. (2017). Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum Peradilan, Etika dan Moral. Al-Itjima International Journal of Government and Social Science, 2007, 159–180

.

Hashimov, E. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers: Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014. 381 pp. Johnny Saldaña. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2013. 303 pp. Taylor & Francis.

Judge, D. (2003). Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow? Government and Opposition, 38(4), 497-516+i. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00026

Krupnikov, Y., & Shipan, C. R. (2020). Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.32

Lule, A. (2019). Dinamika Interaksi Legislatif Dan Eksekutif Di Pulau Morotai (Mengurai Konfigurasi Politik dan Penjelasan Alternatif). Jurnal Academia Praja, 2(02). https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v2i02.115

Mattalatta, A. (2009). Politik Hukum dan Perundang-undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.53-72

Purbaningrum, I. A., & Sasono, S. (2023). The Inclusive Democracy in Political Contestation: Overview of Political Dynamics of Gender Mainstreaming from The Perspective of Feminism. International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience (ICDNR 2023), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-148-7_13

Sobhan, P. R., Block, F., Nazrul, K., & Road, I. (2017). Bangladesh ’ s Permanent Liberation Struggle : Constructing an Inclusive Democratic Society Bangladesh ’ s Permanent Liberation Struggle : Constructing an. 2(January).

Solikhin, A. (2017). Menimbang Pentingnya Desentralisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v2i1.2120

Syukriy, A., & Andra, A. J. (2006). Perilaku oportunistik legislatif dalam penganggaran daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang, 23–26.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-03