Political Dominance of the Nobles in the Golkar Party of Bone Regency

Authors

  • Muhammad Amril Pratama Putra Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nursaleh Hartaman Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46507/jclp.v1i2.163

Keywords:

political dominance, political parties, nobility

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out how the political dominance of the noble descendants in the Golkar party of Bone Regency. The research method used is qualitative with several research indicators processed through nvivo12 plus application. The results showed that the political dominance of noble descendants (Andi) on the Golkar party body has been going on for a long time, the existence of noble descendants is seen in the Chairman of DPD II Golkar Bone Regency occupied by noble descendants since 1971 - 2024. The dominance was born because the descendants of nobles had the good capacity and popularity in political contestation.  Golkar party in cadre recruitment is open to all circles and does not distinguish from social strata, in the era of democracy there are no more restrictions to process in political parties. So actually there is no requirement to have a noble title to enter the party

References

Aulia, D. (2016). Tinjauan Buku Penguatan Demokrasi : Partai Politik Dan ( Sistem ) Pemilu Sebagai Pilar Demokrasi. Masyarakat Indonesia, 42(1), 115–126.

Basir. (2016). Bangsawan Dalam Pilkada. Publikasi Ilmu Pemerintahan Unhas. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/handle/123456789/23721

Budiatri, A. P., Haris, S., Romli, L., Nuryanti, S., Nurhasim, M., Darmawan, D., & Hanafi, R. I. (2017). Faksi dan Konflik Internal Partai-Partai Politik di Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 14(2), 261–275.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). “Research Design. Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Edisi keempat.”. Pustaka Pelajar.

Dronkers, J., & Schijf, H. (2001). From public offices to the cultural or economic sector. How Dutch nobility kept its elite positions during the 20th century. University Library of Munich, Germany, MPRA Paper.

Faruk. (2010). Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra: Dari Strukturalisme Genetik Sampai Postmodernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fjelde, H. (2020). Political party strength and electoral violence. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319885177

Hapala, M. (2019). Political Parties in Czechoslovakia, 1918-1938. In Political, International, Social and Economic Aspects, 124–140.

Hartaman, N., Purwaningsih, T., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). The Aristocrats Power on Local Politic in The Regency of Bone 2013-2018. Journal of Governance, 5(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7033

Jakubowska, L. (2016). Patrons of history: nobility, capital and political transitions in Poland. Routledge.

Meijers, M. J., & Zaslove, A. (2021). Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach. In Comparative Political Studies (Vol. 54, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938081

Monaque, R. (2017). Leadership in the French Navy during the Revolution and Empire. The Optimist and the Pessimist: Louis-René de Latouche- Tréville (1745–1804) and Pierre Charles de Villeneuve (1763–1806). In Naval Leadership in the Atlantic World: The Age of Reform and Revolution, 1700–1850 (pp. 99–106). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book2.j

Muksin, A. (2018). Partai Politik dan Sistem Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(6), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.47313/ppl.v3i6.476

Norrby, G. (2007). Nobility under transformation: Noble strategies and identities in ninteenth century Sweden. Virtus| Journal of Nobility Studies, 14, 157–175.

Rismawidiawati. (2016). Bertahannya bangsawan luwu. Patanjala, 8(3), 413–428.

Rosana, E. (2012). Politik Partai Politik dan Pembangunan. TAPIs, 8.

Siavelis, P. M., & Morgenstern, S. (2020). Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1765

Suhaimi, E. (2021). Pola Rekrutmen Politik Berdasarkan Ideologi Partai Politik Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 18(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v18i1.2021

Vekarić, N. (2012). The Proportion of the Ragusan Nobility at the Closing of the Major Council in 1332. Dubrovnik Annals, 16(16), 7–22.

Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative Analysis Using Nvivo, The Five Level QDA Method. In Routledge. New York and London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December 2022

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in Journal of Contemporary Local Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).